Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29th April 2007, 03:41 AM   #1
Antonio Cejunior
Member
 
Antonio Cejunior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Macau
Posts: 294
Default

Hola Marc

Hace muy tiempo que no nos hablamos, hombre
Glad that you liked it.
Antonio Cejunior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2007, 04:29 PM   #2
josh stout
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
Default

Yes it is a huge and amazing book. The photos are lovely, and show the folding patterns very well which is hard to do. There is one funny blooper I noticed in the Korean section where it twice mentioned the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1952. "whatchagonado"
Josh
josh stout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2007, 09:26 PM   #3
Marc
Member
 
Marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madrid / Barcelona
Posts: 256
Default

Hola, Antonio.

As you can see, is only a question of finding the right kind of bait


By the way, I have to say that dealing with Mike at Shadow of Leaves has been a dream, also.
Marc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007, 02:07 AM   #4
Antonio Cejunior
Member
 
Antonio Cejunior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Macau
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc
Hola, Antonio.

As you can see, is only a question of finding the right kind of bait


By the way, I have to say that dealing with Mike at Shadow of Leaves has been a dream, also.
Hola Marc,

I see
Actually I lost your contacts. When a computer hard disc goes crazy, or when I moved apartments, that was lost

Anyways, I think that Michael Crampton from Shadow of Leaves is a most honorable gentleman and everyone was well serviced I am sure.
Antonio Cejunior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007, 03:50 PM   #5
josh stout
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
Default

I totally understand about the very infrequent typos. I am sorry I mentioned it. The date reversal did not detract at all, but it was slightly amusing. The look of the book overall is quite good. As I said, the photos are works of art in their own right, and show some very special pieces. I am most interested in the Chinese section where the catalogue helps on a subject where there is very little information available in English. Someday I wish there could be information on Chinese swords that approaches the information on Japanese swords, but at the moment, the field of Chinese sword scholarship is simply not mature enough.

There is one particular sword that I would love any more information on that you might be able to locate. The Ming dynasty willow leaf sword (#94) with the horse tooth pattern welding and the nickel silver fittings is one of the most beautiful sabers I have ever seen. Is there any information on its provenance? The medial ridge on the blade and the lobed guard are certainly things found on Ming swords, but I was wondering what other information was used to date it. It appears to be a very important piece.
Thanks for your help,
Josh
josh stout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007, 10:40 PM   #6
Antonio Cejunior
Member
 
Antonio Cejunior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Macau
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by josh stout
I totally understand about the very infrequent typos. I am sorry I mentioned it. The date reversal did not detract at all, but it was slightly amusing. The look of the book overall is quite good. As I said, the photos are works of art in their own right, and show some very special pieces. I am most interested in the Chinese section where the catalogue helps on a subject where there is very little information available in English. Someday I wish there could be information on Chinese swords that approaches the information on Japanese swords, but at the moment, the field of Chinese sword scholarship is simply not mature enough.
Not a problem It is very difficult to keep a tri-lingual catalog like this free of typos. The eyes get tired on the revision, and as known, we read by words and so if it type worng instead of wrong we will still read it correctly.
There are many books in Chinese about swords, but not translated to English...
As for the bronze pieces, it is amazing to show the ring knife was already in existance in jade and it went all along through Han. Then I have seen a Song piece which is curved, in a Dao shape


It is documented in the stone rubbing below





Quote:
There is one particular sword that I would love any more information on that you might be able to locate. The Ming dynasty willow leaf sword (#94) with the horse tooth pattern welding and the nickel silver fittings is one of the most beautiful sabers I have ever seen. Is there any information on its provenance? The medial ridge on the blade and the lobed guard are certainly things found on Ming swords, but I was wondering what other information was used to date it. It appears to be a very important piece.
Thanks for your help,
Josh
Ah yes, it is a sanmai, called jiagangin Mandarin. The horse tooth pattern is what the makers did, and it came from the Zhou Zheng Wu's own Museum collection. Being native to LongquanZhoubelongs to a multi-generation of smiths so it isn't surprising that he has all his contributions handed down and in a condition that is reliable because Long quan was the most important sword and celadon center.

Hope this helps.
Antonio Cejunior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007, 11:06 PM   #7
Mark
Member
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Default

The interesting thing about this horse-tooth pattern is that even Zhou Zheng Wu, a master smith, has been unable to duplicate it. He said its one of those mysteries of ancient Chinese swordmaking that he has yet to unravel.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007, 02:03 AM   #8
Antonio Cejunior
Member
 
Antonio Cejunior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Macau
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by josh stout
"whatchagonado"
Josh
Funny because I noticed that in the original that was sent to us had exactly 1952 instead of 1592 as I have online
But for long, when people pointed out these typos that do happen, I used to remind them that for each typo that passed 100 were spotted and corrected.
Antonio Cejunior is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.