Yesterday, 04:04 PM | #5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,951
|
I think the issue at hand is, as crucible steel is in essence produced in the same manner as the mysterious 'wootz' of Middle East, India but in the west. So the question, in my 'lay' perception is.....how are the smelted products of these versions of steel different?
If I understand correctly, the smelted steel becomes ingots, and these ingots of iron fashioned into carburized steel are then used to forge blades. Then it becomes the manner in which the raw steel is forged, with proper tempering, temperatures, quenching etc. As can be seen, my understanding of these important factors in the making of blades is hopelessly basic as my knowledge of edged weapons is more historic and of swords in finished product. The steel, its differences and characteristics is most important, and I admit its complexity has intimidated me to the point of avoidance. If I have understood, the 'wootz' steel was produced in the Middle East, but the furnaces in India and Sri Lanka produced the ingots which were traded to many blade making centers in other regions and cultures. In the same manner, steel produced in Sweden was a much traded and desired form which provided ingots to makers throughout Europe, England. I am not sure if the Swedish steel was crucible or not......ingots seem like they were more blockish, like bars of precious metal. How is crucible steel different from that produced in blast furnaces ? Again focused on western methods. |
|
|