Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11th November 2024, 03:30 PM   #1
xasterix
Member
 
xasterix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 663
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Interested Party View Post
Thank you again for your responses. Could I ask some follow up questions for clarification?

What is the outline at the elephant's mouth?

Secondly. If the blade of "A" is thin, light, and springy like a butchers knife. Lenticular in cross section. without a distinct raised spine and described in post #7 as "For the blade itself- I would posit Mindanao (Maranao or Maguindanao); if I'm correct in this, then it's a hybrid piece, Mindanao blade with a Sulu dress." What would it be for? Without a raised spine is this a dress piece or could it be for quick slicing movements rather than heavy chopping blows?

"After sharpening, I use a honing steel to align the edges. IF it's a full wavy kris, I use the honing steel for everything (sharpening + honing). Sometimes I strop with leather as well." I have been experimenting with a honing steel this summer on softer chopping blades. Particularly on a small right-handed talibong the size of a large work knife. If you are stropping the blade with leather, should I take that to mean that you are getting your blades razor sharp or almost before cutting tests?
Halloo again!

As a general rule, I was taught that a light and fast Kris blade, especially those without a central spine, would be worn by non-warriors: shopkeepers, dignitaries, business owners, and other members of the nobility. Whereas heavy Krises were more likely to be worn by warriors and officers. A member of the nobility would find a heavy Kris cumbersome to carry around especially during social functions, therefore a light blade is preferred. A warrior would be used to weapon-weight and be able to handle heavy kris built for war.

As with many things, the construction of the sword depends on the owner- his stature (both physical and societal), preferences, and role in society. The attributes of the Kris is more owner-based rather than technique-based.

There are many schools of thought with regard to cutting tests. Some would cut with antique swords with edge as-is. But I favor smoothening out chips and dings, sharpening as much as possible following the original edge geometry, then stropping. I usually prioritize edge geometry over going into high grits; I actually only use a diamond stone with 600 grit on one side, and 1200 on the other, before I hone and strop. I believe in testing antiques in a "fresh" state, just as swords would be before they are subject to the rigors of the battlefield.
xasterix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.