British 1796 HCS pattern blade shape

[Jim McDougall]

The note on the dates on the heavy cavalry swords:
On underside of the disc: 2D
14
BN30
The top is of course the unit
Next is the year of issue
Next the rack or issue number

As noted I have seen 14 and 15, uncertain of 16 but these are the only ones of have seen so marked. These have been in discussions over the past 20 years or so, but the issue and research have been since the 1970s. Richard Dellar has had notable success in investigating this topic.
Morgan was keyed on hilt design and to my recollection never made comments on markings in the work I am familiar with.

Thank you for correction on the Austrian cavalry sword..it was indeed the 1769....always wanted to find one but never did

Triarii thank you for the additional insights on the particulars of actual situations with these items.
Most interesting in actual experiences, you guys with these re-enactments etc. are amazing, and your keen attention to details give us perspectives we would not otherwise have.

[Radboud]

Originally Posted by Jim McDougall

The note on the dates on the heavy cavalry swords:
On underside of the disc: 2D
14
BN30
The top is of course the unit
Next is the year of issue
Next the rack or issue number

Thank you for those details Jim, markings on these swords are still so much of a mystery with many regiments doing their own thing. I hadn’t realised that in some instances dates had been positively identified. Of course in later years they become more uniform and common place, but in this era so much still appears to have been down to the individual regiment.

Re the Austrian 1769, I only remember the model because the date is, ironically, transposed in the 1796.

[Jim McDougall]

Originally Posted by Radboud

Thank you for those details Jim, markings on these swords are still so much of a mystery with many regiments doing their own thing. I hadn’t realised that in some instances dates had been positively identified. Of course in later years they become more uniform and common place, but in this era so much still appears to have been down to the individual regiment.

Re the Austrian 1769, I only remember the model because the date is, ironically, transposed in the 1796.

You bet Radboud! British regimental markings are indeed a mystery, especially those used in the colonies during the Revolution...the abbreviations are total conundrums and rather than official or standard markings....they used things such as so and so's dragoons, or the same with foot.


Good mnemonics on the Austrian sword date!!!