Is it a real Keris?

[A. G. Maisey]

Thank you HughChen.

I believe that we are looking at an East Javanese keris, or possibly Madurese. I had that thought that it might be current era, but I am now not so sure.

To form any sort of defensible opinion on age I would need to handle this keris, however, it is a real keris and I believe the abstract figures are intended as two nagas.

The dress is South Sumatera & appears to be recent.

I am not able to form an opinion on whether this keris was put together in East Jawa, perhaps Surabaya, or whether the blade was taken to Sumatera & it was put together there.

[HughChen]

Originally Posted by David

Looks very much like a real keris to me. Double naga?

Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey

I think so, but a full length pic would help.

Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey

Thank you HughChen.

I believe that we are looking at an East Javanese keris, or possibly Madurese. I had that thought that it might be current era, but I am now not so sure.

To form any sort of defensible opinion on age I would need to handle this keris, however, it is a real keris and I believe the abstract figures are intended as two nagas.

The dress is South Sumatera & appears to be recent.

I am not able to form an opinion on whether this keris was put together in East Jawa, perhaps Surabaya, or whether the blade was taken to Sumatera & it was put together there.

Thank you for reply, I think it looks weird and designed very modern.

[A. G. Maisey]

I do not understand "wired" in this context.

[HughChen]

Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey

I do not understand "wired" in this context.

Thanks for reminding, I've correct this misspelled word.

[A. G. Maisey]

OK --- got it.

No, it is not weird, nor is the style modern, it is totally legitimate, but it is the type of thing that modern makers in East Jawa/Madura like to produce, and to my eye, there are a couple of characteristics that do not say "old" whilst other characteristics do say "old".

From the pics I cannot form a defensible opinion.

[HughChen]

Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey

OK --- got it.

No, it is not weird, nor is the style modern, it is totally legitimate, but it is the type of thing that modern makers in East Jawa/Madura like to produce, and to my eye, there are a couple of characteristics that do not say "old" whilst other characteristics do say "old".

From the pics I cannot form a defensible opinion.

Thank you Alan, I think it might probably be new and not good. Because I once purchased one in similar dress (as pics). It looked good in video and pics, but when I received it, I found it extremely thin whose point is as thin as a Razor blade.

[A. G. Maisey]

The blade shown in post #10 is old, I do not have an opinion on how old, but definitely pre-WWII.

Old keris often have very thin blades, as do keris of ordinary quality.

More recent keris often have heavier blades.

Whether a keris is old or recent has very little to do with its quality or its desirability.

Certainly an older keris of high quality has a much higher value than a recent keris of high quality. It is also certain that some collectors prefer older keris, but many collectors focus on the artistic aspects of the keris, & these collectors will have collections that contain large numbers of more recent keris.

Just because a keris has some age, that does not necessarily mean that it is very desirable for all collectors.

[HughChen]

Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey

OK --- got it.

No, it is not weird, nor is the style modern, it is totally legitimate, but it is the type of thing that modern makers in East Jawa/Madura like to produce, and to my eye, there are a couple of characteristics that do not say "old" whilst other characteristics do say "old".

From the pics I cannot form a defensible opinion.

Alan, can you tell us what old characteristics and young characteristics have you seen?

[A. G. Maisey]

This is what I wrote:---

"--- I believe that we are looking at an East Javanese keris, or possibly Madurese. I had that thought that it might be current era, but I am now not so sure.

To form any sort of defensible opinion on age I would need to handle this keris,---"


If i look at the gonjo there is virtually no erosion of the greneng & the joint between blade base and gonjo has not opened up, there is no real gap at the wadidang between gonjo & blade, and the core seems to be pretty thick. All this impresses me as recent, maybe even current.

The overall impression is one of age, the pawakan is Ok for age, the twin nagas are an older style of motif but the erosion here is uneven.

As we move towards the point the erosion looks more severe, if this is an older blade the heavier erosion could be because of hardening of the front part of the blade, but if it is a more recent blade --- and I'm thinking post 1980ish --- the erosion is because of false aging that was poorly managed.

I cannot tell with certainty what I'm looking at from the photo, but I sure wouldn't gamble money on it.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with recent, current era keris, taken as they are, they are just as collectable as older keris, in many ways, perhaps more so, but when some entrepreneurial dealer decides he wants to make that perfectly good recent keris look 200 years older than it really is, well, to me that is criminal behaviour.