![]() |
![]() |
#1 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
This is another fine old Moro kris from the Oriental Arms site. It is number 7477 in Sold Items. Here is Artzi Yarom's description:
Quote:
Just how far back was the Moro kris in use? We don't know exactly. The Spaniard, Legaspi, landed in the Philippines in the mid-16th C and early Spanish reports noted the use of the Moro kris, including during the Spanish-Moro Wars that started in the late 16th C and continued sporadically until the end of the 19th C (when Spain ceded the Philippines to the U.S.). The Moro kris preceded the arrival of Spain, but how much earlier is unclear. As always, thoughts and comments are most welcome. . Last edited by Ian; 13th July 2024 at 11:55 PM. Reason: Spelling |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,228
|
![]()
Ian, this Kris is very similar to or possibly identical with a certain Kris, allegedly made in Brunei in 1842.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Thanks Gustav. Do you have any further information, pictures, or reference to that sword? I note a faint inscription on the pommel of the present example which appears to be in Arabic script. Unfortunately it seems much worn and too faint for a translation—perhaps one of our forumites might be able to read some of it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Gustav,
Perhaps this is the one you recall. It is a distinguished Brunei kris made in 1842, according to the present owner. If this is the one that you recall, there are some differences, most of which are related to the ricikin. a. The presence of an "arrow head" on this example, created by two grooves running alongside the sogokan and almost meeting at the top. That feature is absent on the sword in the original post. b. The presence of a well defined point where the first luk on the back of the blade starts is present on this sword and not the other. c. Well defined, unworn, greneng on the ganja only. This contrasts with the original post. d. A convex face of the gandik. The face is concave on the first one. e. The height of the sogokan appears shorter than on the original example. Furthermore, the overall blade seems to have less tapering in width down its length than the first sword, with the width of the first luk being similar to the width of the last luk. Also, the central "pamor" section of the second blade does not appear to have grooves or a central ridge. Lastly, there are obvious differences in the dress of these two, which probably does not tell us very much other than the dress of the second one is definitely Brunei in origin. Ian. . Last edited by Ian; 15th July 2024 at 03:48 AM. Reason: Added annotated graphic |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,228
|
![]()
Ian,
surely that's a completely different Kris than one, which appeared with this description in the old UBB forum about 20 years ago. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Hi Gustav, did you get my PM from a week or so ago?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Xasterix has recently posted some excellent pictures from a Spanish auction here. I have looked through the Moro kris shown in those pictures, and there is one that stands out for me as likely to be older than the others based on its features resembling the Javanese keris.
Panoply A from the Xasterix post has been copied below with the swords labeled. Number A-11 appears to be the oldest one shown in these pictures. It has many features seen on the "modern Javanese kris" which I mentioned above. In addition, the gandik is unusually tall for a Moro kris, more in keeping with some old keris, such as the 16th C keris I have referred to before. In my continuing search for "early" Moro kris, this one may have the most features in common with the Javanese keris. Interestingly, this one does not have an asang asang, and may never have had one (although the quality of the blown up pictures make it hard to tell if there was one originally). Seeing A-11 displayed with much larger, heavier, and (probably) more recent kris, with notably wider and longer blades, suggests to me that A-11 is a good candidate for a progenitor of the "modern Moro kris." I would place it earlier than 1800, and perhaps much earlier. . Last edited by Ian; 21st July 2024 at 08:02 PM. Reason: Spelling |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,284
|
![]()
Another A-11
18 inch blade handle (whale's tooth pommel) 4 and seven eighths inches LOA 22 and seven eighths inches. Last edited by Rick; 22nd July 2024 at 08:07 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 629
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,713
|
![]() Another one! ![]() It's 56,5 cm overall, blade alone 44,7 cm. Last edited by Sajen; 22nd July 2024 at 06:04 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Thanks Rick and Detlef! Two lovely examples. Can you please provide measurements for length of the blade and overall.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Thanks again to Rick and Sajen for adding the dimensions of their swords to the posts above. Rick's sword is a tad bigger, with a blade that is a cm longer (45.7 vs 44.7 cm) than Sajen's, and also longer overall (58.1 cm vs 56.5 cm). Nevertheless, these are significantly smaller than 19th C examples, such as most of those shown in the picture of the panoply above. On size alone, Rick's and Sajen's swords would be considered "archaic kris." As already noted, these two swords resemble the example A-11 shown above.
Taking a closer look at the ricikin on these two swords shows some interesting features, and perhaps some important differences. Sajen's sword is on the left; Rick's sword is on the right Apart from one sword having two asang asang and the other only one, at first sight they look remarkably similar. Closer inspection shows some small differences.
Last edited by Ian; 24th July 2024 at 05:15 AM. Reason: Corrected attributions |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Looking back through the Archives of this site, I came across this most interesting example. It is very thought provoking and had been discussed here a little earlier. Pictures are provided in the later post but are very poor quality. I have spent some time working on them to better define the characteristics on the blade in particular. After more than a decade, it's probably worth reconsidering this keris/kris.
My feeling is that this is definitely a Moro blade but with a strong Balinese influence. My reason for labeling it as "Moro" is the central panel of twist core "pamor" and the presence of an "arrow head" formed by the confluence of two grooves running each side of the sogokan (circled on one of the pictures below). The resemblance of the gandik and lambe gaja to those seen on some Balinese keris was noted previously. Does anyone have an example of the "arrow head" appearing on Javanese or Balinese keris? I would like to know the indigenous name and meaning for this feature because I think it may be a good indicator of "Moro" origin. It is hard to know whether this one ever had an asang asang. There is a curious arrangement at the base of the hilt that might suggest it did, but this was not discussed previously. The relationship of the hilt to a Java daemon was discussed earlier, however. The tip of the blade appears to have been damaged, and was also commented on previously. Dimensions of the sword were not reported. . Last edited by Ian; 26th July 2024 at 01:30 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Continuing in the same theme, here is one from the sold area of the new Oriental-Arms site: Item number 15238. Artzi has labeled this one as Malay Peninsula in origin, and the style of hilt and the asang asang would support that attribution. However, I think the blade is likely Moro in origin for two reasons:
The twist core area on this sword is worthy of comment. Four separate rods have been used with a prominent chevron pattern either side of a central chevron pair. This is unusual and clearly a prestige blade--perhaps a presentation blade. A single chevron pattern is seen in example A-6 in post #8 of this thread. The indicators of substantial age are several:
As with other swords in this thread, I believe this blade predates 1800, and probably by a substantial period of time. . Last edited by Ian; 27th July 2024 at 11:42 PM. Reason: Referenced examples in post #8 of this thread |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,085
|
![]() Quote:
If the horizontal lines you are referring to are the ones on the front of the gonjo (gangya in Moro terms), these lines are indeed often present in Javanese keris of the Banten period (16-17th century) as well as Balinese keris. But you can also find these lines on well made Moro kris from the late 19th century. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,713
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you very much for this reply. As far as a Malay attribution, I believe there are Malay blades that have asang asang. Whether these are Malay blades repurposed by Moros, or Malay blades made for Malays that have asang asang, is unclear. See also here. As I look at what I believe to be Malay sundang blades, these tend to be straight and a little wider than most Moro sundang, and usually have a central groove that runs almost the length of the blade. Is that your experience also? I would reference the blade for item A-9 (in the panoply above, post #8) as being in the Malay style but perhaps of Moro manufacture. It has a central groove with a double-chevron, twist-core pattern, and an atypical gold (?) hilt, which appears to have been restricted to high nobility owners. There are pictures of Datu Piang and a Maguindanao Sultan having swords with similar hilts. Our fellow forumite, Battara, has another example with the same hilt style that he posted here a long time ago. I have not seen Malay sundang with classical sogokan or blumbangan, although longitudinal ridges and grooves starting adjacent to the gangya and running various lengths down the blade seem common. Looking at hilts on Malay sundang, I find them sometimes hard to distinguish from Sulu hilts. A small round ferrule, perhaps imitating a mendek, appears to be a consistent feature on Malay sundang, as well as a somewhat "fatter" grip section often bound with cord and sometimes segmented into three sections by raised metal rings. Most Malay sundang appear to be crowned by a simple kakatua pommel with side panels, with ivory being a common material. Please tell me if I am mistaken about any of these features. The picture you posted appears to be a Sulu or Maguindanao sundang showing twin lines below the concave edge of the gandik, and another pair of lines at the bottom end of the gangya (cocor). It is interesting that you note these styles present on 16-17th C Javanese keris. This helps, I think, in understanding why some of the so-called "archaic Moro kris" show these features fairly consistently. Could you post pictures of a 16-17th Javanese kris showing these lines below the gandik and on the gangya? Thanks David. Regards, Ian. Last edited by Ian; 1st August 2024 at 06:57 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,085
|
![]()
Sorry Ian, i had missed your question. Here are a couple of examples. I can add more when i find them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,186
|
![]()
Here are examples of Indonesian kris sundang with asana-asang
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,186
|
![]()
Here is one of mine. It is ivory, swassa, and silver. Not much of a pamor in the blade. I believe this is from Tawi-Tawi.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,186
|
![]()
Perhaps I'm missing something, but Malay and Indonesian sundang are virtually the same.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
I was referring to Melayu or other ethnicities/regions now considered part of Malaysia. Are you using "Malay" as a generic term for Malay people, defined broadly?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,186
|
![]()
Now that I think of it, I guess I mistakenly was using it as a broader term. I guess I need to do a better job of definition.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Jose, I'm looking at the second of four examples you show of non-Moro kris. This one is dressed in a distinctly non-Moro fashion, which I think originates from somewhere in what is now Malaysia. The blade (from what I can see of it—there appears to be a lot of active rust) does have an "arrow head" feature that is highly correlated with Moro manufacture. So this looks like a Moro blade (probably from the Sulu Archipelago) that has been owned by a Malaysian.
Your first example might also be an old Sulu blade, redressed in a Malaysian fashion. The last two are completely non-Moro in origin. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,186
|
![]()
I agree. Lots of trade within the region.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Looking at old fighting versions of Moro kris, I believe this one is a no-frills example from no later than the early-mid 19th C. The gandik area suggests that this is a Maranao blade. There are no sogokan or blumbangan.
The blade length is 48.0 cm (19.0 in) and OAL is 58.8 cm (23.1 in). The ivory kakatua pommel with side panel is diminutive, measuring just under 3.8 cm (1.5 in.) from tip of the "beak" to tip of the "crest." The scabbard has a nice old banati wood cross piece, but the remainder of the scabbard has been replaced with an unattractive hardwood. The scabbard toe is tilted up and the corresponding smaller back piece has broken off. This is an old scabbard style. Indicators of age are the relatively short blade, the diminutive pommel, and the scabbard style. . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,186
|
![]()
Looks like silver wire at the bottom that had a silver band over it. And the top looks like it was a later addition, perhaps the whole wrap is, over the silver wire wrap underneath.
Nice honest piece. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
Thanks Jose. I think that the fiber cord wrap does cover an underlying silver wire wrap. The handle feels thicker than usual. Unfortunately, the wood core has a break near the middle of the grip and the handle has quite a lot of play in it as a result.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|