![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Here are the views obtained with rotation of the long axis of the sword. They show that tang width at various points along the hilt shows slight narrowing with progressive rotation from horizontal (0º) to vertical (90º), but not enough to suggest that this is a flat tang. The flattening is somewhat accentuated by the sword coming off the table as it was rotated, because of the effect of the gangya. Allowing for some parallax by referencing the width of the tang to the width of the cylindrical hilt at the same point, indicated little difference in width of the tang in each projection. This suggests a round tang IMHO.
Images have been rotated for ease of viewing the changes associated with rotation of the sword. 0º rotation (horizontal) 30º rotation 60º rotation 90º rotation (vertical) Last edited by Ian; 22nd April 2024 at 08:48 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,731
|
![]()
Hi Ian,
Great pictures! But I am not really sure if the tang is indeed round. Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
David and Detlef,
Geometry tells us that the only cross-section that produces a uniform width when viewed from several angles is a circle (or a circular object with many small facets). I believe the pictures show that this is not a flat tang, nor a square tang. I would like to put it through a computerized tomography (CT) scanner, but those are expensive pieces of equipment found only in hospitals and radiology clinics and are not readily accessible. A CT scan would definitively answer if the tang was round in cross-section. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Thanks for posting the digital X-ray pics, Ian!
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,855
|
![]()
If I were a gambling man --- which I'm not --- I think I might back the rectangular horse.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,855
|
![]()
Here is another one in as found condition.
I've had it about 60 years, never felt the urge to restore. The lines on the gandar are lengths of steel wire, exist on both sides. Overall length 23.75" blade length 18.12" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]() Quote:
That is why it is necessary to reference the measured diameter of the tang to some other measurement (such as the width of the silver hilt at that point). When I standardize for the slight differences in magnification resulting from the differences in cropping, the diameters come out to within a fraction of a millimeter of each other. The only view which is slightly narrower than the others is the 90º one. Alan may be correct in thinking that the the tang is slightly flattened, but it is unlikely to be rectangular according to the measurements I made. A CT scan would answer the question definitively. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|