4th Light Dragoons Regimental Sword

Jim McDougall · 31st December 2023, 03:29 PM

What a beautiful and excitingly important sword Bryce!!!
Your collection of examples of swords with stellar provenance is not only remarkable, but astounding! I cannot thank you enough for always sharing them so openly with us here. Its better than a museum!!!!

While this sword of course was not carried in the 'Charge' itself, it belonged to this most important officer later, and by that virtue offers us distinct connection to someone 'who was there'. That to me is a most exciting dynamic.

In "Hell Riders" (Terry Brighton, 2004) Captain Alexander Low is mentioned a number of times, notably he was duty field officer of the day Oct.25th 1854 and was the first to notice Russians had moved up at about 530 AM near the picket at Kamara. (p.82)

During the 'Charge' it was noted that he was carrying a saber "..of considerably more than regulation length, and dispatched eleven Russians".
This was after the formation had gone through the guns, and the 4th Dragoons went at the gunners 'with vengeance' (p.156).

It seems the horses were quite blown in the Charge and as they rode, Capt. Thomas Hutton was severely wounded by a musket ball in his right leg (p.134), he called to Capt Low.....who told him....."stay to your saddle! No use to go back now, you'll be killed!
Many horses had been killed, and troopers took shelter behind their dead mounts as Russian snipers were picking off dismounted men who were unable to grab riderless horses.

Bryce · 31st December 2023, 05:24 PM

Thanks Jim,
Here are a couple of the photos of him in Crimea taken by Fenton. In the group photo he is the guy straddling the chair and in the other he is in the middle, lounging in the wheelbarrow. As you say this isn't the sword he carried in the charge, but it would seem to be the sword he wished he'd had. He even had it service sharpened.
Cheers,
Bryce

Jim McDougall · 1st January 2024, 02:24 PM

He looks like a pretty burly guy! and no doubt was quite a swordsman! strictly business. I found it interesting that the sword he was carrying in the charge was noted as more substantial than the others typically carried at that time.
Could he have had an 1853?
Sounds like his dander was up pretty good as the 4th stormed through the guns, and the Russian gunners were scrambling as he took out eleven!
It sounds suspect that such a specific number is given.....but what is certain is that he must have seemed a demon from hell to those guys as he tore through them.

Bryce · 1st January 2024, 10:34 PM

G'day Jim,

Low's nickname was "Beefy".

There is a photo of him with a sword taken in 1854. I don't know if I have permission to share it, so I will hold off posting it. When you zoom in on the hilt, it looks to be either a 4 bar hilt or even possibly a symmetrical hilt. The resolution isn't the best, so I can't be certain, but it does look to be non-regulation as described.
Cheers,
Bryce

31st December 2023, 05:24 PM	#2
Bryce Member Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: North Queensland, Australia Posts: 187	Thanks Jim, Here are a couple of the photos of him in Crimea taken by Fenton. In the group photo he is the guy straddling the chair and in the other he is in the middle, lounging in the wheelbarrow. As you say this isn't the sword he carried in the charge, but it would seem to be the sword he wished he'd had. He even had it service sharpened. Cheers, Bryce Attached Images

31st December 2023, 03:29 PM	#1
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 9,952	What a beautiful and excitingly important sword Bryce!!! Your collection of examples of swords with stellar provenance is not only remarkable, but astounding! I cannot thank you enough for always sharing them so openly with us here. Its better than a museum!!!! While this sword of course was not carried in the 'Charge' itself, it belonged to this most important officer later, and by that virtue offers us distinct connection to someone 'who was there'. That to me is a most exciting dynamic. In "Hell Riders" (Terry Brighton, 2004) Captain Alexander Low is mentioned a number of times, notably he was duty field officer of the day Oct.25th 1854 and was the first to notice Russians had moved up at about 530 AM near the picket at Kamara. (p.82) During the 'Charge' it was noted that he was carrying a saber "..of considerably more than regulation length, and dispatched eleven Russians". This was after the formation had gone through the guns, and the 4th Dragoons went at the gunners 'with vengeance' (p.156). It seems the horses were quite blown in the Charge and as they rode, Capt. Thomas Hutton was severely wounded by a musket ball in his right leg (p.134), he called to Capt Low.....who told him....."stay to your saddle! No use to go back now, you'll be killed! Many horses had been killed, and troopers took shelter behind their dead mounts as Russian snipers were picking off dismounted men who were unable to grab riderless horses.

1st January 2024, 02:24 PM	#3
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 9,952	He looks like a pretty burly guy! and no doubt was quite a swordsman! strictly business. I found it interesting that the sword he was carrying in the charge was noted as more substantial than the others typically carried at that time. Could he have had an 1853? Sounds like his dander was up pretty good as the 4th stormed through the guns, and the Russian gunners were scrambling as he took out eleven! It sounds suspect that such a specific number is given.....but what is certain is that he must have seemed a demon from hell to those guys as he tore through them.

1st January 2024, 10:34 PM	#4
Bryce Member Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: North Queensland, Australia Posts: 187	G'day Jim, Low's nickname was "Beefy". There is a photo of him with a sword taken in 1854. I don't know if I have permission to share it, so I will hold off posting it. When you zoom in on the hilt, it looks to be either a 4 bar hilt or even possibly a symmetrical hilt. The resolution isn't the best, so I can't be certain, but it does look to be non-regulation as described. Cheers, Bryce