![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,781
|
![]()
Ah I see what "milandro" is on about. The profile of opening for the blade is wrong for this decorated blade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 462
|
![]() Quote:
It would be most unusual, though, that this would have a cavalry blade since the guard is most positively one for navy ( very prominent anchor). Something may be the matter. There may have been legitimate reasons why this blade is there or fishy ones (you see the navy connection? ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
...
Last edited by Gustav; 19th October 2023 at 03:18 PM. Reason: irrelevant after Milandro's post |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,781
|
![]()
Having dismissed the curved sabre blade I have found this I will add the link . 1827
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,781
|
![]()
More stuff here that suggest some variants are around.
https://www.fordemilitaryantiques.co...al-navy-swords |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
Yes, Tim, I also thought a reforged pipeback could be the explanation of that strange diagonal fuller, if there is any at all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,781
|
![]()
I think you are spot on something fishy here. If it was a special Wilkinson's fit up or conversion, with such lavish decoration, clearly for a high ranking bod then I think they would have made the blade fit properly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|