![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,857
|
![]()
I did not experience warnings nor difficulties in accessing the page.
I run Norton. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,287
|
![]()
I don't want to pile on, but I had no warnings either from my rig about this site. (insert shrug here)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
My antivirus software (Bitdefender) warns me that Vikingsword is not a secure site and I have to ignore it for logging in
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,732
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,287
|
![]()
I seem to remember Lee explaining the reason for retaining the present designation; IIRC it had something to do with switching the address from http to https.
I'm sure he can enlighten us does he see this. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]() Quote:
My site still shows available with both protocols... why I don't know exactly, I would have expected HTTPS to be the default, but I think having the HTTPS sorted in the background now negates the security warning issue regardless of how it is approached... Anyway, thanks for the link David, appreciated. There might be a safe space I can open it, I'll ask my IT guy, as it was he who encouraged me to go HTTPS to indicate it is a legit and safe site, to gain a larger audience trust. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|