![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
I have personally not much to say about these modern pieces, only that the pamor does not look typical of Pulo Tirto (islands in the sea) IMO, and the dapur is odd....
Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 462
|
![]()
well the Dhapur, color and pamor (whatever it is) is what attracted me.
I find it very nicely styled and I particularly appreciate the fact that they decided not to immerse it in acid to give it a pretend ancient look. I wanted to have precisely such thing and a German dealer in Denpasar whom I had asked to be on the lookout showed me this. It was not too expensive so I decided to acquire it. Thank you for your comment Jean, maybe others would care to join in the conversation |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]()
Well, i might have something to say, but for some reason this is all i can currently see of your posted bethok.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 462
|
![]()
I have no idea why, but I can see it perfectly and Jean has seen it too (or he wouldn't have been able to comment) , there has to be something wrong, maybe your browser?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]()
Yeah, weird. I can see it now, so some kind of weird browse glitch to something. Yours seems like a nice modern example. If i were to acquire a modern example of this form i would also prefer one that has not been artificially aged.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 462
|
![]()
cheers , yes, I like its simplicity and I find it very pure in its shape. Odd, yes, maybe, but odd isn't necessarily bad
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,857
|
![]()
I have not previously commented because I cannot see anything to comment on.
It is a current era keris, the craftsmanship appears to be middle of the road, ie, neither good nor poor, the form is moderately unusual, but this is a pretty common characteristic of current era keris, it has a random pamor that was probably too thin to begin with --- or maybe the slorok was too thick --- & was unable to support the carver's needs. The curve where the blumbangan meets the kruwingan appears to be very clumsy, but this could just as easily be because of the way the light falls. The wrongko is poorly carved, I cannot comment on the hilt because I cannot see enough of it. I cannot see anything in this keris that would make it weird or unusual for a current era keris of this quality. I rather like the elongated gandhik with its Sunda style curve, the gonjo appears to be neatly fitted, I do not like the failure to manage the ada-ada in a more harmonious way, but any minor criticisms that might be able to be made of this keris are not justifiable:- it is what it is, and it does not pretend to be a major work of art. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
bethok, linggis, methuk |
|
|