1st February 2021, 09:29 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 196
|
Question about a motif.
Can someone explain the motif on the back of the handle to me?
Kurt Last edited by Lee; 1st February 2021 at 09:55 AM. |
1st February 2021, 09:32 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Germany
Posts: 244
|
Maybe it has something to do with the angel Peri?
Regards |
1st February 2021, 10:07 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
Absolutely stunning khanjar. One of the most beautiful I have ever seen.
It seems to have a date and an inscription. Clearer photos of the writings may help. Will send the photos to a friend of mine who may know more. Last edited by mariusgmioc; 1st February 2021 at 10:26 PM. |
1st February 2021, 10:28 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
Could it be Krishna suckling at Putana' s breast? It is a Hindu tradition, and im not sure if that fits this weapon. However, the motif seems to fit.
|
1st February 2021, 10:45 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Germany
Posts: 244
|
Possible, too.
I have a link to a site of a german villa. There you can find a statue of a Peri angel which also fits your motif. http://eichinger.ch/eichifamilyhom/R...ermesVilla.htm |
1st February 2021, 11:39 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
Quote:
|
|
2nd February 2021, 06:42 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
Indeed they appear to be Peri, but what about the two inscriptions?
It may be they shed more light on the subject. |
2nd February 2021, 08:45 AM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
"Oh Kind!" (usually an appeal to Allah). Year 1250 (1255?) |
|
2nd February 2021, 09:28 AM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
Thanks Kurt |
|
2nd February 2021, 09:34 AM | #10 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
Quote:
To my eyes looks definitely like Qajar 1250/1834 (or less likely 1205/1790), but I wanted to hear first other opinions as I wasn't very confident in my Nasta'liq date reading competency. Also the very aesthetical style of decorations appears to be right for that period. Let us wait to see if my friend will find a fitting explanation for the carvings. Meanwhile, it would also be nice to see a little more detail of the wootz pattern. PS: I don't believe it is 1255 because it is a big difference between the supposedly 5 - ٥ and the 0 - ٠ in the carving. Last edited by mariusgmioc; 2nd February 2021 at 09:46 AM. |
|
2nd February 2021, 09:35 AM | #11 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
1255 that would be = 1839 |
|
2nd February 2021, 11:39 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 196
|
wootz pattern.
[QUOTE=mariusgmioc]Thank you Mahratt!
To my eyes looks definitely like Qajar 1250/1834 (or less likely 1205/1790), but I wanted to hear first other opinions as I wasn't very confident in my Nasta'liq date reading competency. Also the very aesthetical style of decorations appears to be right for that period. Let us wait to see if my friend will find a fitting explanation for the carvings. Meanwhile, it would also be nice to see a little more detail of the wootz pattern. PS: I don't believe it is 1255 because it is a big difference between the supposedly 5 - ٥ and the 0 - ٠ in the carving. [IMwootz pattern. |
2nd February 2021, 02:07 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
Yes, this is crystalline wootz pattern, rather typical for 19th century Persian blades.
So to me, everything in this dagger is consistent with the possible date of 1834. Also the scabbard appears to be the original. Very, very nice piece! |
3rd February 2021, 09:45 AM | #14 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 196
|
Similar motif
Quote:
The only difference : There are no roses in the basket. |
|
3rd February 2021, 11:19 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 153
|
I would suggest the date rather as
سنه (٠٠)١٢ "Year 12(00)” 1200=1785-6 What people have read as two zeros/fives are part of the decoration/flowers. A zero would be a small diamond-shaped dot ۰ , like the one above the letter nun here, and a five would be a heart shape ۵ . I would rather suggest that the two zeros after 12 are implied rather than written |
3rd February 2021, 01:45 PM | #16 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
Quote:
However, this time, I beg to differ. It is possible that the round "flower" after the numerals "١٢" (meaning 12) is simply for decoration but I believe it represents the numeral "٥" (meaning 5), only it was made to look as a flower for aesthetical reasons. If one examines the carved cartouche, one may notice that all the other flowers are either outside or in line with the outline of the branch, and are slightly smaller. The only "flower" that is inside is the one following the numerals "١٢" and I believe this is for a reason. The same holds for the cartouche above where all four flowers are in line with the outline of the branch and are smaller. So I believe the carver wrote "١٢٥" (meaning 125) but but wrote it in a more decorative form. Moreover, the elaborate style of the carving definitely belongs to the 19th century and not to the 18th. Last but not least, the type of the wootz is not consistent with the Kara Taban or Kara Khorasan with fine watering streaks used predominantly in the 18th century. This type of "crystalline" wootz appeared approximately at the beginning of 19th century (based on my own observations). Last edited by mariusgmioc; 3rd February 2021 at 07:23 PM. |
|
3rd February 2021, 02:33 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 153
|
I think you are probably right. I agree it looks 19th-century and that 125(0) would fit better. Also, normally only one digit is normally missed out in a date.
Though Persians never wrote 5 this way, as a circle, maybe they have adjusted the shape to fit the decoration as you suggest. |
3rd February 2021, 02:51 PM | #18 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
Quote:
What about this? Does it mean anything? |
|
3rd February 2021, 03:18 PM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 153
|
سنه
sana “Year” I seem to remember that there are loads of these daggers in Bern in the Historisches Museum. There might be one with the same design - I would check the catalogue but the libraries are all closed for the while. |
17th February 2021, 11:22 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 196
|
Khandjar with a very similar motif.
Found photos of a Khandjar with a very similar motif.
The same craftsman? Same workshop? Best Kurt |
17th February 2021, 11:21 PM | #21 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,217
|
Looks like glass gemstones, but still nice.
|
18th February 2021, 07:54 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
The scabbard is Ottoman Iraqi. I wonder if the gemstones were added later, in Iraq...
|
18th February 2021, 09:05 AM | #23 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
Best Kurt |
|
18th February 2021, 11:56 AM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 405
|
Persians had their own calendar, 'Jalali'.
If this is a Jalali date; 1250 would be 1872. Best wishes Richard |
18th February 2021, 01:03 PM | #25 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,194
|
In post 20 above there is an interesting figure on the reverse side of the hilt to the one with the two peri. Does anyone know what that figure is representing?
|
19th February 2021, 10:02 AM | #26 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
Hi Ian , Maybe a prince? Or the owner's portrait? One can only speculate there. Kurt |
|
19th February 2021, 10:12 AM | #27 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,194
|
Quote:
Is there anything about the dress of the individual that might help with identification of the style and period? Ian. |
|
|
|