|
13th January 2021, 06:31 PM | #1 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,183
|
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=2lvz3v_dtyA |
|
8th February 2021, 10:26 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
I was hoping for more meaningful discussion... so allow me to reignite the subject. Here are 2 newly made wootz blades: one on the left, next to old Assad'Allah blade (for comparison), is made in Turkey. One on the right is made in Finland. The first is a sword blade. Both look just as good as original, and stunning work.
|
8th February 2021, 11:12 AM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
Quote:
In the old wootz, you have very fine long streaks flowing in intricately curved/twirled/watery (like winding rivers) patterns. In the new wootz, you have short patches more like a mosaic. PS: I am also quite suspicious about the claims of many more or less recent wootz makers claiming they managed to fully reproduce antique wootz patterns. Even the late Al Pendray published together with Verhoeven some images of wootz he produced (photo 1a, 1b) that looked pretty much the same like the antique one (albeit different - please notice the more mosaic-like pattern of the base metal). Yet, none of his hundreds of wootz knives he commercially made (photo 2) displayed the same pattern. Why?! Also much more recently, a Finnish blacksmith claimed to have reproduced exactly the patterns of antique wootz. Yet, when I asked him to make a blade with the same pattern for me to buy, he declined, saying that he still wants to refine the method. Also the Russian Ivan Kirpichev comes very close to reproducing the antique wootz patterns (see photo 3). However, he told me he cannot make bigger blades and cannot get consistent results. So, I believe that while some modern blacksmiths have managed to come closer to reproducing the antique wootz, none is really capable to fully do it with consistency. However, I have seen a new sword blade that reproduced the old patterns almost perfectly, made by a Russian blacksmith and mounted by Gotscha Lagidse. Yet, it was pattern welded! But it was so deceivingly looking that reportedly even Zaqro Nonikashvili thought it to be wootz. Last edited by mariusgmioc; 8th February 2021 at 05:19 PM. |
|
8th February 2021, 12:02 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
PPS:
It should be noted that even antique 19th century Indian or Persian wootz did not display the old watery patterns anymore as 19th century wootz looked more like the crystalline wootz that is produced these modern times. You can see such an example of a Persian khanjar made around 1850 at the link below: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=26676 |
8th February 2021, 02:47 PM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
Quote:
|
|
8th February 2021, 03:10 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 470
|
The rt side example looks like it could have been produced by a pool and eye lamination method.
To my understanding the ore that the crucible process used affected the pattern greatly, but I know very little. Wootz seems sort of an Eldorado to me. There may be several generations of hard work before it is understood. The Al Pendray book is on my summer reading list. Marius, what are the two bottom examples? Marked "Resim:1" |
8th February 2021, 03:59 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
Quote:
|
|
8th February 2021, 05:22 PM | #8 | ||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
Quote:
Quote:
Or it may be the pattern weld I was talking earlier, that was practically undistinguishable from old wootz. Whoever claims to have done it, should be able to consistently reproduce these results and make some blades for sale (like Kirpichev does). |
||
8th February 2021, 10:19 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 186
|
G'day Alex,
Where did you get the right hand side photo from? To me it looks exactly like antique wootz. I have an antique blade with a very similar pattern. Cheers, Bryce |
|
|