|
24th September 2017, 06:54 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
Here is an Afghan Jezail. There are many, many Jezail specimens available today. There are exceptions of course, but for the most part these guns do not have major collector value. No dought due to the many remaining specimens, and the fact there are not as many collectors for the Eastern guns like there are for the blades and armour.
And this one was no exception. It was in poor condition when I received it. It's only real value being the genuine English trade lock versus a locally made copy. I bought this gun with the intent purpose to have it restored to full, safe shooting condition. It's historical value (if any) was of minor importance in this case. Functionality over historical value. A full restoration was done including a new steel, rifled barrel liner inside the original barrel. The gun now has a new life and is much fun to shoot. And that was the goal in this case. Before and after pics: Rick |
24th September 2017, 07:08 PM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
Quote:
|
|
24th September 2017, 07:24 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
|
Hopefully, the Moderator will allow a couple pics of a Europen gun here just for comparison purposes.
Here are a couple pics of what is generally termed by collectors as a Northwest Trade gun (Fusil). These guns were made primarily in England for sale/trade to North America. Especially during the say 1790-1850 period. And most were probably traded to the North American Indians. Even though they were likely made by the thousands, there are relitively few survivors remaining, and are rare in any condition, and very desirous for collectors of this period. In the case of this gun, it is actually an original Belgium made copy of the English guns. Which adds further to it's rarity, but not necessarily to it's value. It's condition is no better than Fair, converted from flintlock to percussion back in the period, as most were. It has seen heavy usage, and was probably used all the way till it's tumbler/sear broke. Even the barrel is held to the stock with two pieces of (later) wire, having it's barrel lugs coming unsoldered sometime in the past. But it's historical significance, and collector desire/value are such that no attempt at restoration would even be considered. A case of history over function. I'm simply the next caretaker for this gun. So this gun is the exact opposite of the Jazail on my previous post. Hope this gives you a better idea. Rick |
24th September 2017, 10:59 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Thanks Rick!
Your position is noted and it clarifies a lot . End justifies the means, in a positive sense. Again, thanks for the lesson. |
25th September 2017, 04:10 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
Sind percussion long gun, 63 inches, converted from matchlock. This has two stock splices, they do not appear to have been glued at all, how common was this, I have seen this before on Indian matchlocks.
|
3rd February 2019, 07:44 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 55
|
Adding another persian rifle here. Similar connection of two pieces of wood. A little bit different rifle butt.
|
6th February 2019, 10:27 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,079
|
I have seen Western percussion muskets with a two piece stock as well, though they had a very well fitted mortise and tenon join rather than a V splice. Anything beyond the forward hand grip point contributes nothing to the structural integrity of the piece anyway.
|
7th February 2019, 08:35 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,739
|
Another Sind with spliced stock
This Sind also has a spliced stock, but only one splice, and never glued by the look of it.Simply held by the bands.
Stu |
|
|