![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
![]()
My wife is visiting Moscow, Russia and saw this painting. Any idea what this sword is? I want to say the blade looks like a Black Sea Yataghan, but the hilt is wrong.
Your thoughts? DaveA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Please see the below link - post 12, image 4.
This is early shamshir-like blade form, later seen on Russian and Caucasian swords. There are several in Hermitage and Topkapi collections. http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ight=hermitage |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
![]()
The blade in the picture is recurved. I don't see that among the examples in your linked photo.
More info: this painting is exhibited alongside 16th century icons. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jerusalem
Posts: 274
|
![]()
Hi David,
I am not an expert on swords at all, and I am sure that other forum members could spin fantastic theories about this sword. However, this is a very old painting, probably early renaissance, depicting the beheading of a saint, who was probably martyred in the event. Realism is not very strong in paintings from that period. I can not reconize the country of origin the painting or the specific saint, but most of those events happend even much earlier and in places far away. So there is a good probability that the sword is not of a real type known to the painter, but was born out of his imagination intended to look exotic .. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
![]() Quote:
These weapons are from the region we call the Middle East and are not nearly as old as the one depicted in the painting. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
In the link, scroll down to post number 12, 4th image. Similarly shaped recurved blade. The painting is a bit stylized but the curve matches. 16th Century also matches this blade type period.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
![]() Quote:
I agree, the sword in picture #4, post 14 could be a match. That sword is very interesting. Is the tip conical, as in a pesh kabz, for piercing chain mail armor? Dave A |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]() Quote:
An interesting thread where the early art is matching the early item. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Alex, are you referring to the old Circassian saber that Kirill Rivkin identifies as mysterious Jateh?
I am very dubious. IMHO, there is no mystery here, just a drawing inaccuracy of the artist. I vote for a simple Shamshir-like saber. The artist was no Rembrandt, that's for sure. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Ariel, there are also 2 examples in the Astvatsatryan "Caucasian Arms" book, from the 15thC Russland. Their "bayonet-like" tips are not recurved as in the painting... the later example from the Hermitage seems to be later development of the form with more developed recurve... The forms of the handle and crossquard also conform to the 16thC period. I believe the author of the painting depicted the sword based on observed sample(s) of that time.
... Here is the image of Hermitage sabre. The obviously stylized painting may refer to similar sword, notice the similarities in the blade and handle forms - almost pomeless handle, short crossguard, slight recurve to the blade. IMHO the similarities are quite evident to be an imaginative depiction. Last edited by ALEX; 17th July 2017 at 12:55 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
![]()
Hello,
Before going deeper into this, I think we should notice that the blade in the painting DOES NOT FIT the scabbard where it is about to be inserted in! So the recurved curvature is more likely the result of a painting error. The painter started with a curvature, but then realised that the curvature wouldn't bring the tip of the blade to the opening of the scabbard and since he couldn't simply erase the blade and paint a new one, he simply made the adjustment to the curvature. As simple as that. ![]() An indication regarding the skill of the painter can also be derived from the position of the hand holding the sword... ![]() Alex, the sword in the museum photo has an obviously bent & twisted blade and is not at all recurved. ![]() Last edited by mariusgmioc; 18th July 2017 at 10:29 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Alex, I see your point, but still tend to agree with the "detractors".
Your assumption is based on the configuration of the blade as it is presented by the medieval European artist. BTW, what is the exact age of this picture? And what part of Europe is it from? My point is that the Circassian/Crimean saber you are referring to was limited to a tiny and pretty isolated area. Yes, I know that the Genoese had their trading posts in Crimea, but I find it less than convincing that the Crimean/Circassian pattern was well known enough in Europe to serve as a model for an artist. This pattern is exceedingly rare, and the few existing examples date to the 17-18 century ( see books by Gutowski and Rivkin) . The earliest known example in European collections is in Sweden, allegedly a military trophy of Gustavus II Adolfus and is dated to 1600, well after the potential date of the miniature in question. No doubt: this pattern was in actual use even earlier, but for that we have to go deeper into Circassian archeology, with only singular examples in local burials. This was a rare pattern to start with, mainly due to its complex forging, clumsiness and the resultant impracticality. While we have literally hundreds of existing "Tatar" sabers with regular blades dating to 8-15 centuries, the "bayonet-tip" recurved ones can be counted in a couple of dozens at the most. I am with Marius here: IMHO it was just a technical artistic goof. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Personally, I'd not doubt the author's intent as the painting is of superior quality and execution overall. It was done by a master iconographer who was capable of drawing a straight line, and I assume it to be of 16-17thC Russian origin. As for these recurved blades - yes, they're rarer than straight bladed swords nowadays, and likely were as such back then, but this is not an overwhelming argument that they were unseen/exceedingly rare in 16-17thC. Their fragile construction could be a contributing factor to their low survivalability to the present day. This is unproved of course, and until better evidences it'll remain an individual opinion.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
This does not look to be of Russian origin, and is definitely older than 16-17 century.
My guess ( an I am not an art historian), it is Western European, well before 15 century ( I would not be surprised by 13-th-14th, or even earlier). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Ariel, You're right. Not a Russian painting. It is Italian, mid 15th Century by Sano di Pietro (Siena, Italy 1405-1481): Beheading of St John the Baptist.
Here's another of his works showing straight swords, he certainly knew how to draw a straight line ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
![]() Quote:
I didn't doubt his capacity to paint straight swords. It is curved swords that make me doubt. And specifically the sword in the original image that, the way it is painted, CANNOT FIT IN ITS SCABBARD... if it were for real. And if you want to further asses the painter's skill, try to insert a saber in its scabbard using exactly the grip and the position of the scabbard from the painting. Good luck! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 44
|
![]()
Hello All
As soon, as I looked at the painting I thought of the Tatar Saber. I have couple of observations that mostly answer to mariusgmioc's post and that's the reason I quote it. Quote:
![]() http://vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=4101 Quote:
Quote:
![]() To answer the question as to how would Europeans know about the Tatar sabers; here is an article in Wikipedia about Lipka Tatars: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipka_Tatars And the timeframe matches. IMHO, For an European (Italian) painter to paint a scene that took place in the Middle East, a good reference for a foreign weapon could be Tatar Sabre that would look exotic (at least to Europeans) and could have been used by Tatars in Ottoman army, who (Ottoman Empire) occupied Jerusalem during the time of the painting. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
![]() Quote:
And yes, the Tatar saber fits its scabbard but the one in the painting does not, exactly because of its reverse curvature. 2. "That's exactly how one would hold the sword to be able to put the tip of the sword in."... Well, maybe, but only if the sword has the edge on its concave side of the blade, or if it is used like a Shotel. However, for a normal saber, the grip is with the fingers towards the edge side, and the thumb towards the spine side of the blade. 3. I do not know whether the painter started with a sketch and how detailed the sketch was. Moreover, I do not know how easily can a painting error be corrected. I am only speculating that the reverse curve in this case is simply the result of a technical painting error that the painter didn't consider important enough to correct without visible trace. Last edited by mariusgmioc; 23rd July 2017 at 09:26 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 44
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,430
|
![]()
Here is a fanciful painting by the sixteenth century Elizabethan artist John White of a "Pictish Woman" (European Iron Age). She is wearing some sort of Eastern European scimitar type sword...
John White accompanied Sir Walter Raleigh's early attempts to colonise North America and produced some of the first depictions of Native Americans. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
![]() Quote:
Now I have the irrefutable proof that my suspicion was well founded! ![]() PS: Now, even the origins of the Ottoman crescent can be traced back to the old Picts (just have a look a the lady's pendant). Last edited by mariusgmioc; 26th July 2017 at 04:17 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|