|
28th July 2015, 11:18 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
One of a very well known dealers had in his catalogue a true Pala blade with a disproportionally long yataghan handle.
I am still kicking myself for not buying it. I recently contacted him and asked whether he had a copy of the catalogue: no, he sold all of them. |
29th July 2015, 07:07 PM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
Quote:
|
|
31st July 2015, 04:07 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 406
|
I agree, Mr Alnakkas,
Swords, or saif, found either in what is now Saudi Arabia, or in photographs taken in what is now Saudi Arabia, seem to be of these two distinctive types, but never a hybrid of the two. I would imagine the two originate in distinctively different areas, i.e. the pala or kilij outside the Arabian peninsular, and the saif within, from Syria and Iraq, southward. Regards Richard |
1st August 2015, 01:42 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Marriages of unrelated blades and handles are older than dirt. After all, there were no " regulation patterns" and each owner was free to rev up his fantasies.
Miller in his book on Caucasian arms shows a marriage of a Khanda blade with a typical Georgian Khmali handle. CharlesS here had shown us multiple even crazier examples. BTW, many of those mixed marriages last longer than those of their owners:-) |
|
|