Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 4th September 2014, 12:10 PM   #1
fernando
Lead Moderator European Armoury
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kmaddock
...Yataghan style bayonets were across the nations ...
Britain had them on the Snider and enfield rifles ...
... As also in the Westley Richards ... at least in the versions exported to Portugal.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2014, 01:39 PM   #2
Kmaddock
Member
 
Kmaddock's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 539
Default

Hi Fernando
a bit out side my comfort zone, but
I think Westley Richards were just contracted to Enfield to make the pattern 1853 Musket
commonly known as
Enfield pattern 1853, 3 Band rifle

Westley Richards were (and still are gunmakers) but I am unaware if they make an actual model rifle that was adopted by armies.
I am happy to be correct on this,
i would be interested to know if the bayonet was the same though as i am on the lookout for a Snider conversion rifle bayonet to match my Snider and a portugese version would be acceptable
regards
Ken
Kmaddock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2014, 03:27 PM   #3
fernando
Lead Moderator European Armoury
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Hi Ken,
Westley Richards also had military comitments.
They even tried to introduce their pistol in the British Army, without success.
Their 'monkey tail' system became famous; following a couple flirts with the Portuguese Arsenal, patent allowance and all that, ended up with a contract of 1000 pistols to Portuguese Cavalry (the only existing quantity of the kind), besides a few thousand rifles and carbines.
Not so easy finding the correspondent (sword) bayonets.

.
Attached Images
File Type: pdf teste ordinance PDF.pdf (211.2 KB, 611 views)

Last edited by fernando; 4th September 2014 at 03:38 PM.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2014, 04:49 PM   #4
Kmaddock
Member
 
Kmaddock's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 539
Default

Hi Fernando
Thanks for extra Information
Ken
Kmaddock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2014, 09:17 PM   #5
spiral
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
Default

If only it said spiral! Id have to find one!

Interesting piece!

Spiral
spiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2014, 12:49 PM   #6
NigelP
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 6
Default

Hi all. Sorry not to follow this up sooner but have just returned from a three-week vacation .

Lots of interesting comments. I found this which is remarkably similar;

http://www.stewartsmilitaryantiques....9.archive.htm#

In answer to the comment about a T-section then yes it does look like a (waisted) T in cross-section behind the point region; ie it has a flat top to the blade.

No sign of "Klingenthal".

This blade is a little over 18" long ( a bit shorter than the one in the link above).

Any ideas about the name Spital? I didn't manage to trace this name on the web.
NigelP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2014, 04:20 AM   #7
M ELEY
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,087
Default

I made an error earlier with the 'Klingenthal' comment. Very tired these days- What I meant to say was a French marking for the arsenal at St. Etaine, but you say there's no marking at all on the T-backed balde. Any signs that it has been sanded or rubbed off? The etchings are sometimes weak to begin with...
M ELEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.