|
6th November 2005, 12:04 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 478
|
Blade is Key?
I think Rick hit the nail on the head with his tribal/regional observation. To go even further I propose that we should view the Khyber blade style as native to a much larger area than Afghanistan and that its very practical and beautiful shape has been variously hilted to suit the disparate tastes of a wide variety of ethnic groups. After all, do we really have any hard evidence the this blade style orignated in Afghanistan? Could it not have just as easily come from Iran, Pakastan or North India? In support of this contention, I point to Figiel (On Damascus Steel) pg 69 which shows a " 'T' shaped back edge" Khyber style blade from "Northwest India" or "Persia" with an Indo/Muslim "Deli Shahi type" hilt. In addition to this, I am posting pictures of two Khyber style blades with hilts that differ from those already shown in this thread. The larger of the two features a 29" (73.66cm) blade and a 5" (12.7cm) horn hilt whose one piece scales look like a cross between a peshkabz and choora hilt. The smaller blade is 26" (66.4cm) long and has a 6" (15.24cm) wooden hilt that looks like an enlarged kard hilt.
Sincerely, RobT |
6th November 2005, 12:43 AM | #2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,288
|
Well , if we take Figiel at his word then all Khybers could come from Persia as I have yet to see one with a ricasso .
I think along with a possible tribal variation we should also take into account the creativity of the smith who made the individual piece ; artistic license if you will for the smaller variations in hilt style and bolster . |
9th November 2005, 08:44 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
|
Here is a similar all steel sword, most likely from India. n2s |
9th November 2005, 02:28 PM | #4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,288
|
From the picture I'm seeing no T shaped spine , and a false edge ?
Aside from the hilt it looks a bit like a Kirach blade . There certainly is a confusing variety in the E.W.'s of India . Should we start to classify Khyber/Salawar Yataghans by blade features ? Oh yes , and just when I had stated that I'd never seen a Khyber with a ricasso someone comes up with one . http://www.ashokaarts.com/edgedweapons/ew-46.html |
9th November 2005, 04:10 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Sorry for joining so late. I believe the two different types Ariel shows are due to tribal differences, like stated earlier.
Rick, I think N2s is playing tricks on us, showing only part of the sword. I think I see a false edge too, and do I also see a ricasso? I too was surprised to see a Khyper knife with a ricasso, and I am with you about the ‘artistic license’, but I don’t buy RobT’s suggestion about expanding the area, where these knifes was used, widely. Sometimes Afghanistan was a province of Persia, and sometimes of India – it was even at times regarded part of India – not a province. |
|
|