|
25th January 2011, 07:18 AM | #1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
|
Regarding the hair on the scabbard, I actually have seen hair on them like this before. Leave it alone since it is part of the actual manufacture.
On the hilt, well, I guess you could also leave it alone since it is later, but not too late. Part of the working life of the piece? (unless you know of someone who can create a carved hilt for it, but why not leave it as is since the carving is good on it.). |
25th January 2011, 04:27 PM | #2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
Jose, I would never change or remove the hair on the scabbard, I was just wondering whether or not to change the hilt to a more traditional form. Thank you again for your help.
Robert |
25th January 2011, 07:14 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
it's a binangon, no doubt. no matter how you slice and dice it, it's what we would call that piece.
|
26th January 2011, 03:42 AM | #4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
|
Ron is this based on the blade? Also is this based on nomenclature from Iloilo? I know that there was speculation on catagorization years ago here, but no hard evidence.
|
28th January 2011, 06:55 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
jose, dunno how technical they were back in the old days, but growing up, anything larger than a butcher knife was called a binangon
|
28th January 2011, 08:05 PM | #6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
Anyone have an idea of the age of this piece or when the hilt might have been replaced?
Robert |
|
|