![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Fernando,
no luck on the ethnographic forum ![]() The Sai, the 3 pronged dagger/defensive weapon is almost a hand held trident ....interestingly it is suggested it originated in Indonesia...or thereabouts. The trident as a spearhead or hand held 'implement' makes perfect sense for the island communities where fishing is so important. Afterall medievel farm implements were mounted on shafts and used in battle. ".........The sai is known to have been used in other parts of Asia before its arrival on Okinawa, such as India, China, Indonesia, Siam and Malaysia. Early evidence suggests Indonesia or the neighbouring area as the sai's point of origin. In Malay the sai is known as a tekpi or Indonesia language as chabang (also spelled cabang or tjabang, meaning branch) and is thought to derive from the Indian trishula. The chabang quickly spread through the rest of Indo-China and may have reached Okinawa from one or more of these places simultaneously........." Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hi David,
Beautiful piece, this Sai. My tri-thanks for your dedication to this perforated cuirass cause ![]() By the way, i have recently unhanged this item from the wall, to rearrange some weapons display, and noticed that the riddling holes only perforated the first layer of steel, having not gone through ... for what it matters. Much of a coincidence if they were made by the prongs of a weapon ![]() ... More likely a mechanical operation, for the hanging of whatever ? ![]() ![]() Case not closed, anyway. May i show you the new rearrangement? Have a sunny Sunday, my friend ![]() Fernando . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Dear Fernando,
your display is a bit 'cluttered'......GET RID OF THE FURNITURE ![]() ![]() Could the second 'layer' (of the breastplate) be a later addition ? repair ? Sunny Sunday ... In England ![]() ![]() All the best David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() ... just kidding ![]() ![]() Fernando |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]()
Hello there,
normally I'm not into this kind of thing but the thread was too interesting for just rummaging through it ![]() The trident-thesis is quite fascinating, but I'm not sure if these marks could have been made by any form of weapon. Don't want to spoil the show, but I doubt that any hand-held weapon could do that kind of damage... a) Imagine the setting: A spanish soldier is in close-quarters with a native let's say Indian fighter who is using his trident to stab at the soldier. He must use an awful lot of power and speed to procure this kind of punctures. Because normally the metal would either bend inwards (three spikes transferring its energy on a broad area) or the trident would just scrape the metal (which should leave visible scratches). The last case might not happen if the Indian is stabbing at an angle close to 90 degrees in regard to the breastplate. But referring to the sketches this seems unprobable. b) The form of the punctures also speaks against a battle damage. There are two sets with 3 marks each, which are nearly paralell.... the Indian must have had good eyes to execute the second stab just to get this design ![]() And now comes the really hard part: I must admit I have no other explanation ![]() All the best William P.S. Perhaps some kind of marking that the piece was sorted out of the regular armoury equipment. Similar to the X used by the english War Departement to mark gund which are to be sold to civilian distributors... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|