Zaghnal

Jim McDougall · 19th May 2009, 07:26 PM

Hi Bally,
Thank you very much for stepping forward, and I second Ricks comment, it takes distinct courage to admit error especially publicly...but in this case it is a matter of simple oversight, so no apology is necessary.

Actually, as I previously noted, I was pleased that my work was considered worthy of such application, and particularly that it was 'one of our own'..which you profoundly are!

This thread actually resulted in some good discussion, not as much on the topic of the accrediting in use of material, as on the study of these interesting dagger axes. This caused my review of earlier notes and adding somewhat I believe to what we know on them from extant sources.

Thank you for your kind words and for your forthright action, and especially for being a valuable member here........right on Bally!!!

All the very best,
Jim

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

19th May 2009, 07:26 PM	#19
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 10,192	Hi Bally, Thank you very much for stepping forward, and I second Ricks comment, it takes distinct courage to admit error especially publicly...but in this case it is a matter of simple oversight, so no apology is necessary. Actually, as I previously noted, I was pleased that my work was considered worthy of such application, and particularly that it was 'one of our own'..which you profoundly are! This thread actually resulted in some good discussion, not as much on the topic of the accrediting in use of material, as on the study of these interesting dagger axes. This caused my review of earlier notes and adding somewhat I believe to what we know on them from extant sources. Thank you for your kind words and for your forthright action, and especially for being a valuable member here........right on Bally!!! All the very best, Jim