|
9th January 2009, 04:21 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
My first guess was for wootz. Not the best quality pattern, but I think it is wootz... if judging by appearance. The chemanalysis would propably not confirm it:-)
Sham is by definition low contrast, and the contrast is high here, hence I'd not vote for sham. Last edited by ALEX; 9th January 2009 at 06:36 PM. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode