![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
Quote:
I can understand the confusion over the forms. I struggled for years to learn and differentiate the different forms. In fact, I still do get baffled every now and then by the various forms. The Bugis influence in these kerises are evident, whether they're from the Peninsula or Sumatra. However, there are subtle differences which are consistent enough to differentiate between the regions. Of course, there are always the oddballs that appear every so often. Unfortunately, I won't be able to 'tell' you easily what these differences are, at least not without showing you the physical forms. I asked the same questions myself when I started out and was rather frustrated that the seniors could not effectively articulate the differences to me. Now I find myself in the same position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,151
|
I have very little expertise in the correct classification of keris from outside Jawa, but when I first looked at the photos of this keris the general "feeling" I had from it was Sumatra. The way in which the blade has been made, the pendongkok, the atasan of the wrongko, to me these all say "Sumatra" but they do not even whisper anything else.
Blu Erf has much more experience with these types of keris than I do, and if he casts his vote for Sumatra, that combined with my own feeling is sufficient to cause me to go along the same track. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|