14th September 2007, 03:28 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: dc
Posts: 271
|
This might be of interest to some.
Shaikh Faisal Bin Qassim Al-Thani Museum
http://www.fbqmuseum.com/collect_all.htm Not great stuff, but interesting none-the-less. |
14th September 2007, 04:26 AM | #2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
I see that a ram dao was pegged as Islamic?
Lew |
14th September 2007, 05:35 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Thanks the jambia &Saif are nice...
Pity the 16th century mughal axe is a modern fake kukri bayonet from india.... Spiral |
14th September 2007, 05:47 PM | #4 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
|
|
14th September 2007, 05:57 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
Nice collection but it could do with more research. A cinquedea is identified as a Mughal sword...actually most things are identified as Mughal.
|
15th September 2007, 12:10 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: dc
Posts: 271
|
Most of the Yemeni jewelry and a lot of the jambiyas look like tourist pieces to me.
|
15th September 2007, 12:54 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
|
15th September 2007, 01:21 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Quote:
mmmm in a way Rick, kukri bayonets did exist in the early 19th century but they looked nothing like that. Micheal are the gold scabbard Jambiys for rich tourists or true pieces, do you think? Spiral |
|
16th September 2007, 03:25 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: dc
Posts: 271
|
Not tourist, but expensive modern decorative pieces would be my guess. Not that there's anything wrong with that. I'd like to have them.
|
16th September 2007, 05:14 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Thanks, me to!
Spiral |
17th September 2007, 04:18 AM | #11 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
Quote:
Lew |
|
17th September 2007, 11:11 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
Actually, Lew, it is forbiden for men to wear gold, but not women. I think that silk is also forbidden to men, but not women.
|
17th September 2007, 04:22 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Thats intresting re.Gold, I understand Many of the most sought after Yemini Jambia have gold coins on them.
Perhaps different sects in Islam follow different rulings or teachings? Or perhaps its like Christians should theoreticaly be against money lenders but Banks still do rather well in the Christian world? The Vatican even has its own bank after all. There certanly have been gold coins minted in many Muslim countrys too. mmmm Id like to know more about this. Spiral |
17th September 2007, 08:51 PM | #14 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
Quote:
Interesting how people get around religious laws. I have a Moro kris with gold in the hilt and a barong with a gold ferrule. As I understand it (limited understanding here) the prohibition is more against being worn, like jewelry, than coins or weapons. Even in being worn, it is not entirely prohibited, unless there is a lot of it. A silver watch with gold numerals is ok, but a gold watch is not ok. I am not going on hard facts and knowledge here, just opinions from Muslim friends. They are researching further. |
|
17th September 2007, 11:51 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Thanks Bill thats interesting, I like the olive oil story.
I was told once that thaler & Victorian soveriegns were popular in Arab & Muslim African countries as A Woman on a coin, an unveiled one at that was considered Risque or naughty. I wonder if gold embelishments are sort of "naughty" but acceptable as not bieng "worn" even if always carried? Spiral |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|