clunker saif?

Pukka Bundook · 15th February 2007, 05:28 AM

Well I'm still with you chaps, and find it all very fascinating!

Katana's observation appears to me very possible.

I do not know how many known examples of sa'ifs have a guard like this one.
The ones I have seen either have a 'D' ring, or 'quillons' that taper out and down, away from the blade, not curling in in the manner of a ring guard.

One observation I can make, is this sword is very handy, fast and very comfortable to hold, with the finger over the cross.
Held in this manner it really comes to life, Yet, the very few other examples of sa'ifs I have seen pictures of appear to pre-clude holding in this manner. (no-where for finger to go!)
The sword does appear to hav been held in this manner, as the sharp corner of the cross is worn down much smoother in the finger area.
I know these obsevations are pointless from an historical point of view, but it may help us understand this specific ring shaping.

I must thank all for sharing in this discussion!!

Best,
Richard.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

15th February 2007, 05:28 AM	#21
Pukka Bundook Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 803	Well I'm still with you chaps, and find it all very fascinating! Katana's observation appears to me very possible. I do not know how many known examples of sa'ifs have a guard like this one. The ones I have seen either have a 'D' ring, or 'quillons' that taper out and down, away from the blade, not curling in in the manner of a ring guard. One observation I can make, is this sword is very handy, fast and very comfortable to hold, with the finger over the cross. Held in this manner it really comes to life, Yet, the very few other examples of sa'ifs I have seen pictures of appear to pre-clude holding in this manner. (no-where for finger to go!) The sword does appear to hav been held in this manner, as the sharp corner of the cross is worn down much smoother in the finger area. I know these obsevations are pointless from an historical point of view, but it may help us understand this specific ring shaping. I must thank all for sharing in this discussion!! Best, Richard.