![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
hey rick,
sorry for the late reply but i am struggling to add to what you already know. i think you've done a great job in answering your own questions ![]() the bulbous grip is heavily persian influenced, as is the pommel style. both these features were inherant in north indian pieces, and yet the extreme 'fleur de lys' quillions reek of the south, where the persian influence was less strong. an enigma. i dont have a problem with the quiilion inserts but am confused at the clumsiness. if you hadnt offered an exact example in buttin, i would have doubted the originality (especially with the north'south enigma). i have seem clumsy inserts, but the nature of an indian hilt is in its asthetics and 'flowing form' which seems missing or overlooked here. the koftgari is of a specific style ond of good quality and i'm sure its style will be seen again in another piece. this may offer more information, but wont help with the location of the piece as the applied decoration was rarely done at the same place as the hilt manafucture and 'raw' hilts travelled well. i think the main clue is the 'duck' finial. its a common form, so common i couldnt find a single example in my resources ![]() the pic i've attached is from the khalili collection, and was exhibited in paris '88. the pommel form is along the same lines and the knuckle bow has been removed. the blade is dated 1749 from the provence of Avadh. there are similarities in the form of the hilts and the style of the quillions. i wish i could add more but i think all i have offered is a padded out 'nice sword' reply. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|