![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,738
|
Welcome to the Ethnographic Forum! Interesting question and I hope one of our knowledgeable members will be along shortly to help you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 681
|
Much like their smaller pesh-kabz cousins, Afghan Khyber knives usually have a T-section spine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2026
Posts: 8
|
It seems like T-sections were popular from the Ottoman Empire to India in the 18th and 19th century? I wonder how they made them because that shape can be a pain to grind and polish.
Blades with a ridge a bit forward of the spine remind me of a classic five-sided katana blade. I don't understand blade engineering well enough to understand why katanas have that section. Guillaume Stanislaus Marey-Monge thought it made for good cutters. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
My pet theory is, that it is the natural shape you arrive at when turning the concept of a diamond shaped double edged blade into a single edged blade, keeping it quite robust while reducing its weight. Another weapon type I can think of with t-spine section are pichak knifes from Central Asian Turkestan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 468
|
To belabor the obvious, T-spines provide greater rigidity while using less metal. A brilliant engineering solution, seemingly developed by the Turkic-Mongol crew.
Offhand, I can't think of it occurring elsewhere, but it's early, and my coffee has not hit my brain yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
Thank you for the information, and for your memories! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
N2s |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|