Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2nd March 2026, 06:00 PM   #1
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rumpel9 View Post
Hello everyone. I recently acquired this item. As far as I can tell, it originates from South Sumatra. However, I'm not entirely sure what its specific name is. I'm inclined to think it's a keris, as it has a pendokok and a Putri Malu handle. I might be wrong. What do you think?
Can you add dimensions?
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2026, 08:22 PM   #2
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,255
Default

Detlef, I have no opinion in respect of who might have put it together, none at all, for the simple reason that i have absolutely nothing upon which to base that opinion. To form an opinion, I need evidence, I have none.

However, I do have a picture, & that picture tells me that I'm looking at something that has three or four parts that I have never previously seen combined in a single item.

The blade can be recognised & named, the hilt can be recognised & named, the scabbard appears to have some age and could well have been made for the blade, but can all these parts , assembled as one, be named? To give a name we need a whole group of similar objects that do have a name & a supportable geographic location of origin.

We do not have this.

Then there is the problem of how this implement could be used.

I doubt I would want to use it for anything unless I was wearing a metal mesh glove.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2026, 09:17 PM   #3
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey View Post
Detlef, I have no opinion in respect of who might have put it together, none at all, for the simple reason that i have absolutely nothing upon which to base that opinion. To form an opinion, I need evidence, I have none.

However, I do have a picture, & that picture tells me that I'm looking at something that has three or four parts that I have never previously seen combined in a single item.

The blade can be recognised & named, the hilt can be recognised & named, the scabbard appears to have some age and could well have been made for the blade, but can all these parts , assembled as one, be named? To give a name we need a whole group of similar objects that do have a name & a supportable geographic location of origin.

We do not have this.

Then there is the problem of how this implement could be used.

I doubt I would want to use it for anything unless I was wearing a metal mesh glove.
Hello Alan,

There we are again by the name game! I haven't given it a name, I just wrote that I would place it to the kerambit family, you said with other words the same. It's just my feeling that someone in the Palembang area has created a personal dagger for self defense. It's a unique piece for sure, like you I never have seen a similar piece before! How it can be used is difficult to say without handling it in person. And I wouldn't mind to add it to my collection!

Regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2026, 09:42 PM   #4
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,255
Default

Yes, all true.

Except for who might have put it together, & I'm not prepared to speculate on that, simply to ask for one speck of genuine evidence that might be able to support some opinion or another.

Maybe demount the hilt & see what is holding it in place.

If it had a different hilt on it I might be a bit more inclined to be persuaded, but I've simply seen too many of these marriages over the years to want to play guessing games.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2026, 09:08 AM   #5
rumpel9
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 74
Default

The item itself is quite small. The dimensions are: Overall length 197 mm; Blade length 125 mm; Blade width 17 mm; Blade thickness 3 mm.
rumpel9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.