Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old Today, 03:16 AM   #13
Peter Hudson
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 334
Default

Great replies... but hold on... ...
I have posed the question at post 1 in bold letters and now is the time face it... What was the problem? People were being trained were they not?

But were they being trained to Fence or Fight? This was the dilema ...

Trainers were teaching Fencing skills ..How could that fail?

And now I will place before you the situation... caused by the failure to teach fighting compounded by the wrong sort of sword ...often called a spike with I beams and hardly any cutting facility and the abject failure by the mainly two separate forms of Fencing and never the twain shall meet..and the infighting and disagreement ending in the whole thing being... The End of Swords...Fighting wins wars ...Fencing does not.

I turn to Matt Eastons brilliant paper and ask you all to read it to the end ...where you will see that the whole thing failed because ... we failed to teach Fighting and taught Fencing instead.
Please see https://www.google.com/books/edition...&kptab=getbook

Regards,
Peter Hudson.

Last edited by Peter Hudson; Today at 03:32 AM.
Peter Hudson is online now   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.