![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: France
Posts: 41
|
You right when you say that wootz is harder to work, but in my mind only at the forging steps.. Once finished, you can work it.
See those wide koftgari parts, and other kind of inlay. those was first carved with other tools, obviously harder than the sword (that has a heat treat for softening it, not too hard, or too brittle). Wootz is quite "soft" once correctly forged. Only cementites inclusions gives it its hardenss, but possibly dont make the engraving harder (only supposing, never carved wootz haha). So I dont think that its the reason of such work, even I'm not sure the gard is also made with wootz |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,286
|
19c crucible steel can look a lot like wootz, but isn't I've heard if you over-work the forging you can lose the patterning as it evens out or removes the inclusions that cause it. India ran out of the ore that wootz was made with, and then lost the techniques passed down verbally thru the earlier ages on how to work it. In reality, modern steels are more homogenous and have better properties for swords, but wootz has its mystical appeal. Pattern welded steel or that early crucible steel isn't wootz. There is a Russian who says he's able to duplicate wootz, i'm not sure if that has been verified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,415
|
I've not engraved into wootz but into pattern welded steel. When I hit a harder steel in the pattern, the engraving gets more difficult.
Wootz is much smaller and so I'm not sure, though I can agree that the pearlite particles could make things more difficult as well. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|