Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Miscellania

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 30th January 2025, 04:41 PM   #18
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,189
Default LEAD BALLAST INGOTS

Still doing research on the lead ballast ingots (pigs) used in vessels in the 17th c. and it seems one of the key sources on study of these was written in 2013 by Mack McCarthy, "Lead Ingots from the Wreck of the Zuiddorp (1712) Western Australia" (International Journal of Nautical Archaeology" 2013.

This is incredibly comprehensive and detailed and lists many sources on this topic from many Dutch wrecks of 17th c. into 18th. Apparently English foundry's supplied much of the lead supply for the Dutch and other European nations, though obviously not exclusively, but major supplier.

As I went through this work (very detailed @ 18 pages) I found charts classifying the types etc. and one category (Type IV (ZT 3388 fig.6) has similar 'boat' shape to the CLIFFORD FIND in Madagascar. Apparently the example illustrated is heavier than the Clifford example, the shape is significant.

Also, concerning the markings:
It seems these lead ingots were indeed marked with various motifs, numbers, letters, initials and ciphers, sometimes dates.
Also apparently various merchants etc. would apply their own marks etc. along the use of these.
Rather than always being offloaded as 'wanladen' (useless and with no market value) often these remained in the hull under the cargo floors as part of the vessels weight and balance.

Without delving further into the complexities of lead ballast ingots here, the point is that this mysterious ingot found by the Clifford venture in the harbor at Isle ste. Marie appears to have been an authentically marked example rather than deceptively intended.
While it is puzzling why only a single ingot would be found as most finds of these from wrecks of course number from 100 or more. However, as the debris said to be from dock construction is suggested rather than that of a vessel, perhaps such items might have been used in those activities?
Whatever the case, it seems to have been a lead ballast ingot with examples of the many progressive marking characters used in wide variation in those times.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.