![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 122
|
![]()
I'd agree on the features, especially the bivalve one, being C17th. The work on the quillon block on the bivalve one is quite crude though, in form and finish. Replacement?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 616
|
![]()
I acquired an interesting variation on this theme some years ago (picture forthcoming) and was led to believe it was a Dutch ambidextrous dueling sword.
There is a series of Xs on each side of the blade at the forte. It was dated, by the vendor, to the end of the 1600s. It was considered a transitional rapier - which seems questionable. I have subsequently seen one more with a completely different blade (see final pic) and now yet another two. I think the hilt is the defining identity and look for confirmation as to its origin. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
smallswords |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|