![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]()
To me it looks like Persian wootz.
Why doesn't come out as in high contrast, I don't know as it can have many causes. I found out the best etching results are on surfaces polished to 2500-3000 grit. Higher polish gets worse results as the etchant does not "bite" the surface. I got best results with Nital 4% but this needs to be top quality etchant. I found out that some Nital suppliers don't respect the advertised concentreation and you don't get the expected results. Most of the times, I needed to apply Nital more times. As for the last few years I wasn't able to get Nital anymore, I started experimenting with ferric chloride, in commercially available concentrations, then diluted but without any rigurous measuring. Got generally good results with ferric too. I found out that even on the same blade there may be areas that display hugh contrast wootz pattern and some areas that won't display any pattern at all or a very faint one. My guess is that if the blade is reheated it may loose partly or completely the wootz pattern. I suspect this may be the case of your blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 82
|
![]() Quote:
The reheating causing a loss of contrast is an interesting thought for sure. One interesting thing I noticed from my earlier etches which were way over etched was the near lack of wootz figuring near the blade spine. I'm wondering if the spine was heated at some point. Or potentially the spine is a different steel all together. In the photo posted below, the spine is to the right side of the image. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|