![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 83
|
![]()
I have spent the last few months trying to study the keris. I feel that I have made some decent progress but this one has stumped me. It looks very old to me. The mendak looks aged as well. The ganja may have been gold plated at one point. I know there is ways to make it look older then it is. The main thing is the pamor has got me stumped. There is a character in the design. I didnt even notice till I started taking pictures. I have not been able to find another example like it. It reminds me of Bambang Sumantri. I am sure there is another design on the other side but I can not make it out. Is this an artificially aged piece or just a old keris that is a victim of a few to many citrus baths? Please any assistance with age and region would be appreciated. Thanks
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,819
|
![]()
The wayang figure that we can see has been put onto the blade by what we call the "batik" process. Batik cloth is dyed by covering with wax those parts of the cloth that we do not want the dye to touch. This figure has been created in the same way, it was drawn onto the blade with wax, then the blade was soaked in acid which left the figure in relief.
Regrettably whoever did this was a bit of a novice, or maybe just plain lazy or stupid or forgetful, and the entire blade was soaked in acid for far too long. This has resulted in what we can see, which is a blade that has been damaged so badly that it is probably beyond resurrection. What I can see of the pamor motif looks like a random pattern, wos wutah. It is an old blade, probably Tuban-Pajajaran. To my eye, the gonjo has never had any kinatah work or plating. The wrongko is Madurese ladrangan, it needs a pendok, the hilt is Javanese, it tends towards Jogja rather than Solo, but I cannot get a clear impression from the photos, the mendak is damaged and missing its lower rings. I'm sorry I was not able to be a bit more upbeat, the clown who ruined this keris should have had his own hands put into the acid that destroyed the blade. The heavy etch process to create images in blades was very popular in late colonial times & for a very brief period after WWII. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 83
|
![]()
I few more photos.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 83
|
![]()
It's OK. At least I have learned something new. I have never heard of batik process. I thought maybe something has happened to the blade to make it looks like this. Thank you for the information.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,819
|
![]()
Batik is a process for dying cloth, the keris community in Jawa has borrowed it, more or less sarcastically, to apply to these acid etched patterns on blades.
This explanation of the process for making Batik Tulis is as good as any, & understanding how it works with cloth helps in understanding how the pattern is produced in metal. https://australian.museum/learn/cult...batik-process/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 280
|
![]()
Hello Alan, is something like this typically done in order to make the keris more appealing for resale?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 83
|
![]()
I still havn't came across another example that has something like this done to the blade. I have seen many examples of art done on fabric by the batik process. I assume it is to raise the value. I wonder if it really stands out if warangan is applied? Hopefully somebody will chime in.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,819
|
![]()
Yes Jaga, a lot, but not all of these "enhancements" to older keris are simply to make an old, unattractive, difficult to sell blade more marketable.
But this "batik" thing they used to do although it might have had a plus effect 80 or 100 years ago, has a minus effect now. I've seen a very, very few that have been well done and really have looked pretty good, but most have been outright ugly. I'd put money on it, that if this blade had been left alone and not fiddled with, its market value now would be 20 times what it is in its present condition. It will still be 100% visible after a blade stain, but honestly, I would not waste time or money on this blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 83
|
![]()
It is a shame somebody would ruin a perfectly good antique blade. I understand it is not worth the attempt to stain. I will chalk this up to a learning experience. I will at least still enjoy the history it had before it became worthless...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,819
|
![]()
The wrongko looks OK, and the hilt is usable, keep your eyes open for an orphan blade and you might be able to do a rebuild.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
This blade probably uses the same process but it was well made.
Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 447
|
![]()
I have seen this kind of kris before for sale in the NL, I am sure that I saw the same sitting figure although the contrast was higher and needn't having light coming from the side to enhance the figure's design.
It seems indeed acid etched on the blade with a process which may have used wax or something similar. I personally don't care much for this kind of kris. But there is a lid for every pot. There is certainly someone out there who would like it and I personally wouldn't bother to separate the blade from the rest of the elements which were already put together more or less randomly in the first place. The reason why people collect krises vary from the museum-quality-taxonomic-oriented to the mystical and there is really no account for personal taste, whatever tickles one's fancy, goes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 280
|
![]() Quote:
I agree that it's market value now would be decent had it not been fiddled. There seems to be a healthy appetite to pay good money for blades with 'older' classifications like Paja and its variants. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,819
|
![]()
Yes, you're right Jaga, & often that enthusiasm for attributed age is misdirected. Leaving to one side the archaic kerises, like KB's, the value of other keris depends on much more than just age, quality & condition are extremely important.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 280
|
![]() Quote:
Sadly I think this works all too well for dealers without scruples. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 447
|
![]()
we spoke about this often
there are many traders whom deal with artificially aged or otherwise tampered with krises and , of course, there are many buyers prepared to pay for stuff which is looking corroded or shows " age" . I've seen krises advertised as being from the 12th century ![]() Much depends on what one attributes to the kris and the reason why one " collects" (for lack of a better word). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|