![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Hello André,
Yes, this hilt type clearly represents the pupa of longhorn beetles. That is the reason why the third pair of legs is partially covered by the (future) wing, at least if carved by someone who knows what he's doing. (BTW, are there any female carvers nowadays or is it still considered a pure male profession/past time?) Beetles are holometabolic insects which pass through a distinct pupa stage (as butterflies, etc.) even if the metamorphosis is a bit less striking since beetle pupae already exhibit body and appendages similar to adults (cp. the Nieuwenkamp drawing: both hilts resemble the pupa while the adult beetle on the left is different; one has to concede that the carvers exhibit varying talent/knowledge though, especially nowadays we see all sorts of monster versions). This life stage concept was already alluded to in this discussion and (aside from the Hindu creation narrative) is a really interesting aspect of this hilt type's symbolism, I believe. Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 15
|
An old (Ivory?) Kocet-Kocetan hilt for sharing, it was found intact with a Jalak Budha keris.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Thanks for posting this special hilt, Wijaya!
To me, this looks like an ancestor figural hilt (squatting posture with arms on both sides). Maybe Sumbawa? Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 500
|
I can see a squatting figure but I don't think I can recognise the typical features of a Kocet-Kocetan (at least not the ones that I know as such)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Yes, quite surely not from Bali, I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 15
|
Hi everyone, the hilt was recently excavated in the new Kediri airport a few months ago, so It's likely not from Sumbawa or Bali. I was thinking that it might be some kind of prototypical Kocet-Kocetan hilt before it evolved into it's current form.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
you can look this up about the evolution of this hilts here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Quote:
I'm afraid the idea set forth in this paper is a non-sequitur for me: I'm missing an in-depth discussion why the author chooses to associate Madurese hilts with overwhelmingly similar overall features as well as shared motifs/details into 3 distinct categories: H3, Ins3, and I3. I'd like to see convincing evidence why all these Madurese hilts should be considered not more closely related to each other than to 3 very different "lineages" from a variety of cultures. Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
Whether this is what really happened it isn't possible to say, certainly not with that brief account given there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Quote:
Do you have more pics, please? So, the whole ensemble is as excavated? (Not including the old scabbard, I guess?) Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,217
|
I cannot see any trace of the Kocet-Kocetan/Kusia form in the hilt shown in post #34, to me it looks like a humanoid form, perhaps generic ancestor figure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,289
|
Quote:
Doesn't look like ivory either, but better photos might reveal more. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
From a 2010 trip to Bali.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|