![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
I agree with Brian 100%: Southern.
And the blade is a replacement: it seems to me that Indians tried to use spare parts. Blades, by definition, were more breakable than hilts and there was no sense to get rid of a perfectly good hilt.I still think there is a good possibility that the blade is European. The flanges were never attached to the blade: the distance between them is too wide and there are no rivet holes in them. Very, very, very nice sword, and likely with a lot of history behind it! Congratulations! |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|