![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 622
|
![]()
Jim, that first sword is almost identical to mine. In fact, I would not be surprised if my grip binding was not a replacement for the original antler.
Adding it all up, I now think that the 1553 is probably not commemorating the Grey/Dudley tragedy but is talismanic as you suggest. It would certainly make more sense than trying to consider the blade as early 1500s. Maybe there was a connection to the date 1553 and its tragedy and maybe not: after all, it was a hundred years later and everything had changed a great deal on the political front diminishing the affair. Remarkable research Jim, well-done and many thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|