![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]() Quote:
The engraving does look decent (difficult to tell the depth of the engraving from pics) but the luks and, especially, ricikan details didn't strike me as similarly sophisticated. But this may be just a matter of taste (and missing experience on my part)... ![]() I think nobody assumed this to be one of the flimsy tourist repros made by stock removal - it does look like a serviceable blade. But would this blade fit into Cato's ceremonial category with main emphasis placed on "show" rather than battle-value? Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|