![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
The first lohar were agricultural tools, there is one in Dimitry's book.
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=25678 Kubur |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jerusalem
Posts: 274
|
Sorry guys, but this is not a sickle. It just wouldn't work. Sickles are thin and usually serrated and more curved. This is a thick and almost straight. Because it has an almost triangular cross-section, it is logical to assume it was used for perforating something. But what??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 417
|
I'm not giving up that easily! Whilst agreeing it probably does not fit the definition of a sickle if the definition includes a curved blade, I still think it is most probably a harvesting knife of some sort. With a sharp inside edge I think you could quite easily tackle asparagus, lettuce and similar market garden type crops.
Regards Richard |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,273
|
Antique reaping hook, note the decorative line carvings and the starburst washer under the bolster rivet, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,264
|
At this point can we all agree that this interesting and mysterious item is NOT a weapon? I think it should be moved to the miscellaneous section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,273
|
Yes. Farm tool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jerusalem
Posts: 274
|
Hi Kronckew,
The picture shows what I said in my previous post: that a sickle has broad, curved and often serrated blade. A narrow and thick blade is inefficient for cutting, which the harvest of grain usually involves. Having said that, the picture shows that our object is most probably a farm tool from the same provenance as the sickle. Do you know where the sickle is from? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|