![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 452
|
Tugh head or yes-standards as the correct definition in English.. If lance head, I am not sure but should they not be a bit heavier and stronger to thrust efficiently when thrown?(though I vote on the "not standards" side too)
Last edited by erlikhan; 13th May 2006 at 01:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 91
|
Both the blades and ferrules look like Indonesian tombak to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 186
|
They did strike me as tombak-like too. In his book "Ottoman Art In the Service of the Empire," Zdzislaw Zygulski includes a chapter on tughs. While there are variations, the "classic" Ottoman tugh has a rounded finial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,970
|
They look Malay or Borneo to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 452
|
Right,we can ignore the tugh theory, should be lance heads but from where..I found two samples looking a bit similar here. http://www.ashokaarts.com/non-edged/no-11.html . introduced as indonesian spears, but blades are not seen clear enough,and decoration style on silver collars..?? The question that must be asked can be ,if lance structures in Asian countries were differing very much or not from each other..I dont think they should differ as much as swords or daggers,but?? These pieces were brought here from Syria,that is the only certain fact about them.I made them resticked here. To Syria,could or why should indonesian spears had come in past?? I think I must examine Ottoman lances more carefully in my next visit to Military Museum..
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|