![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
GIO, I think you might be half right.
The forging from which we carve a keris blade is left quite thick & heavy, the pesi is cut square and reduced little by little, not necessarily all at the same time. It could be that this blade was a failure:- the original billet was made too small, the forging could not be left at adequate thickness to carve a proper blade from, so rather than waste the money that was already in it, it was turned into something to keep some halfway pretty dress together. It would serve quite OK for a poor man's marriage keris. So not something that was part-way through manufacture and that could eventually end up as an actual keris, but something that was a failure of manufacture. Based upon what I can see in the images, this blade was not shaped with an electric grinder, but with a file. grinders tend to leave uninterrupted curved lines, the lines on this blade are straight and in some places form a hatch-work effect. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 329
|
![]()
Alan, I fully agree with you. I didn't take into consideration the small size which could be evaluated in relation with the size of the hilt. Such small size would have made impossible to carve the blade correctly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
Gio --- It is often somewhat difficult to guess at things that one has not previously seen. Until you mentioned the possibility of part completion, I did not realise what I was probably looking at.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|