![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,116
|
![]()
Sorry about the photo's, they were done on my rather old phone, in poor light.
My comments were about the blade, which looks over etched compared to most pamor I have seen, and the surface is slick and burnished to the touch rather than matt. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,991
|
![]()
In Jawa just about all ferric weaponry --- and a whole heap of other things --- is cleaned with acid. In other places the cleaning is done mechanically, more often than not with wet sand. The result of a mechanical clean is a more or less polished surface. Sometimes after the clean with sand or whatever, the blade will be stained, sometimes not.
This blade looks perfectly OK to me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,116
|
![]()
Thank you, I feel happier for seeing your opinions. It's not an area I am knowledgeable about, and usually avoid buying, but I could not walk past a blade like this one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 90
|
![]()
One likely more knowledgeable than myself suggested Sumatra as a possible place of origin before I could do so. I acquired a similar article a few months ago, with similar filework on the spine, and a similar hilt, though I myself would've called it a parang. I may well be wrong, though. You could easily have done much worse without even trying.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 4
|
![]()
I have a pamor pedang with an x and 2 lines on the spine aswell the sheath is different though is it a makers mark?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,164
|
![]() Quote:
It's a pedang, not a parang. ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|