![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#28 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,717
|
![]() Quote:
1. The takouba is not exclusive to the Tuareg 2. It does not originate with the Tuareg 3. Perhaps the most important point, it is disingenuous to conflate a sword associated with societal rank and swords which were not used for combat. Associating swords with class position and restrictions on who can carry them is a practice found throughout the Medieval world. You cannot assume that a sword is not a combat weapon simply because it also serves as a symbol of rank. The same applies to the Manding swords and sabres. To be clear, the takouba was a combat weapon, there is a multitude of sources for this including colonial accounts of its use. there are still occasional disputes between Fulani herders and farmers over land rights which see swords used. The Manding sword form and takouba are only related in so far as they occasionally share trade blades. I have already made clear in previously posts in this thread the nature and origin of curved blades in takouba mounts. Just to touch on one last flawed assumption in this thread, lack of a guard has never precluded combat use, from the shashka to the Maciejowski choppers. Last edited by Iain; 8th April 2019 at 08:43 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|