![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 188
|
It might be useful to post photos of sunggingan pieces with a proven provenance. That way everyone can observe the use of colours - and motifs - on actual keraton pieces.
Now the question, of course, is whether there are people who have such photos available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 205
|
Alan, what about the first (black base) Gayaman kris. That's a 'genuine' kraton kris as being identified for a Jajar. Would be most interested to know about that one as that is the one from my own collection. The others are not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,193
|
What did you need to know Paul?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 205
|
If post #4 is done according the pakem rules and if it is worn by a member of the Surakarta Keraton hierarchy.
The handle is a recent (decent) replacement. Old blade (Adeg pamor) fits flush. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,193
|
No Paul, not necessarily.
Hilts can be natural, hilts can be painted, they can be one or the other. As for the idea of "replacement" keris fittings get changed all the time, depending upon the circumstances. For example, the hilt + selut on your black keris, if this keris was intended to be worn at at evening function, and the owner had a selut stel, he would very probably prefer to use it rather than a hilt which did not have a selut. The stones in a selut catch the light at night and throw out flashes. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|