|
|
|
27th May 2018, 11:42 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,164
|
Yes, when I first saw it by pictures I also don't understand. Like you say, it conforms to type. But it's very small, see it here with two normal sized examples from the same general type.
Any guess why/for which reason? Child size? Jimat? Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
27th May 2018, 11:45 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,164
|
Inside scabbard 22 cm, 18 cm without and a blade from 11,2 cm.
|
|
|
|
|
27th May 2018, 11:51 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,991
|
It was indeed a very difficult quiz when there were no measurements given.
However, for what? Saturday night special. Worn under the jacket. |
|
|
|
|
27th May 2018, 11:54 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,164
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
28th May 2018, 06:29 PM
|
#5 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
Were these primarily stabbing weapons?
|
|
|
|
|
28th May 2018, 10:58 PM
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,991
|
Yes.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
