![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Among many examples there is one with the word “khanda” in the inscription.
But only one. There are several non-spatulated blades without handles, there are several non-spatulated ones with Tulwar handle etc. Can Elgood be wrong? Sure. But he spent years researching the topic and is not exactly a superficial guy:-) I would like to know the reason and the way of his thinking before I disagree with him. Wouldn’t you? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: AUCKLAND,NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 627
|
HERE ARE 2 KHANDAS IN MY COLLECTION
KIND REGARDS RAJESH |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,915
|
Quote:
I believe the blade, not the hilt defines the sword, and a typical Khanda is considered as having a straight blade with wide, spoon or diamond shaped tip. Based on this, I consider the second sword shown by Rajesh a Tulwar. If it weren't like this, then all the swords/knives below would be Tulwars but I would rather call them "Firangi, Tegha, Indian Kukri, and again Tegha." Last edited by mariusgmioc; 2nd January 2018 at 12:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|