![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jerusalem
Posts: 274
|
![]()
Hi Ariel, you are right of course. It was late and I did use my words a bit loosely. Denis' idea is a hypothesis and not a theory and I only meant that it was yours because you brought it up, eventhough you did not give an indication that you actually support it. But I am not a moran
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Jerusalem
Posts: 274
|
![]()
Hi Miguel, I hope you are not too dissapointed by my comment. You have a nice group of shybriyas representing both the hay day of shibriyas making with two older and rarer types. You were also right about most of them. They are all in very good shape, which is not that common. In short, a good representative group.
Eytan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
|
![]() Quote:
Far from it, indeed, I am more than pleased with your input for which I am very grateful and think you underestimate your knowledge of this type of dagger. I wondered if the date was 1955 but I didn't know that the dates may be a mixture of Gregorian and Arabic so was confused. thank you again for your input. Regards Miguel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|