![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chino, CA.
Posts: 219
|
I notice that the fuller extends a bit down onto the tang. The grain is tight, fine and wave like. The Tang is tapered enough to end in being peened. Can you get a picture of the end of the pommel?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 447
|
Hi Andreas,
Im sure this is an Original, it looks that it has been chemically cleaned before and now it has rusted again. kind regards Ulfberth |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 393
|
Thanks for the infos! Sounds good.
Will post images of the pommel the next days. Any opinion on the age and geographical classification of the sword? Best regards Andreas |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chino, CA.
Posts: 219
|
It seems to be (from whats left of it) very inline with the dimensions, form and features of an arming sword. And if it were an arming sword and European (that it could be is speculative). You might want to use Oakshott typology to help classify it. I may be wrong but that looks like a type H pommel and type 11 guard. I don't think the blade itself could be fairly categorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 187
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 393
|
thanks for the replies, stekemest and helleri. will have some investigation in this direction.
here are some pics of the end of the pommel. the little pin / rivet is missing, probably broken off or rusted away. best regards andreas Last edited by AHorsa; 19th July 2016 at 08:03 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 187
|
The new pictures convince me it is an original. Congratulations.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|