|
28th April 2016, 11:01 AM
|
#33 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Jim,
You have opened an interesting angle on the theory of evidence. There is a well-known rule in science: absense of evidence is not the same as evidence of absense. Ignoring it is a routine mark of an inexperienced or , even worse, overzealous researcher trying to prove his (or her) pet theory :-)) |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode