|
8th December 2015, 09:22 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,184
|
blade seems a bit roughly filed & of lesser quality than the rest of the unit. i would have expected a smoother finish and maybe even some incised line art. how thick is the blade?
|
8th December 2015, 09:26 PM | #2 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,124
|
Quote:
|
|
9th December 2015, 01:47 AM | #3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,221
|
Now that I see the pictures on a larger screen (and not a phone screen), I agree - the pommel might be something else - close ups might be helpful!
I agree David - the blade might well be the 1950s or even 1960s. However, I have seen 1930s looks/waves in the blade just like these. Many of these after a certain time period were indeed made for US soldiers, although during the ban on Moro swords after the Battle of Bud Bagsak in 1915, gunongs grew more ornate and even larger since they were the only weapons not banned during that same time period for Moros to wear. |
9th December 2015, 02:16 AM | #4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
Maybr these will be of some help. My vote is for shell.
Best, Robert |
12th December 2015, 05:37 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 232
|
Thank you very much for the nice welcome!
Also thank you very much for your inputs on this knife. I really appreciate it. Will take more pictures of the knife when I can do it in natural light. Sajen, you have a very nice gunong Collection. Thanks for sharing. Best, Stefan Sweden |
13th December 2015, 01:24 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 232
|
Here come some more pictures....
Best, Stefan Sweden |
13th December 2015, 07:18 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,184
|
bone...
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|